This story has taken the Internet and social media by storm. I think that a lot of issues have arisen as a result of it, but to me the most important issue is to see what is happening in the home with these young people. The fact that most if not all of them are runaways speaks to a deeper problem in the Black community.
There’s no denying that child trafficking and sex trafficking of young people is a serious problem, and with all the hooplah around Pizzagate and to a more serious degree Pedo-gate, we have to begin with looking in the home and seeing what is happening there to the point that these young people would endanger their lives by running away.
Today, our streets are less safe than ever before, so it’s important to help our young people feel safe within their homes, because obviously, they feel safer in the streets which say a lot about their home environment.
That being said, I strongly encourage young people, male and female who are considering running away from home that they get help from a teacher, mentor, social worker, elder family member, minister or someone you can trust to help you. Call a hotline or something of that nature so that you can get help because the streets are dangerous and you could end up dead or badly hurt and/or abused if you go out there with no protection.
Looking through my Notebook of commentaries, I searched for something that would be interesting to share with my YouTube Audience. Something that would tie in to today but would also be something that could carry its own message of truth and discovery. Needless to say I have so much to share, but knowing you folks out there in YouTube land, it’s hard to stay relevant unless you hop on a subject in the moment, because it simply does not take much time for today’s news to become tomorrow’s passé.
I found something I had written about Paul McCartney almost 2 years ago to this day. What was interesting about it is that while doing another video around the cult of personality and around pedophilia and child sacrifice and Pizzagate, I found these very strange photos of the Beatles, with babies and body parts. I thought that was strange, but it made me think of how these artists are initiated. And even though they came from Liverpool in the UK, the industry is the industry. The pics had an eerie vaneer of child sacrifice with the heads and limbs removed and placed on different parts of the anatomy of the Beatles. The pics also contained what appeared to be fresh cut meat.
“Yesterday and Today” is the ninth Capitol Records album release by the Beatles and the eleventh overall American release. It was originally issued only in the United States and Canada. In the 1970s it was issued in Japan. Wikipedia
Despite being North America’s only source for such great songs as “If I Needed Someone” and “I’m Only Sleeping” for nearly 20 years, the Beatles’ 1966 release Yesterday… and Today is mostly, if at all, remembered for its album cover. It featured John, Paul, George, and Ringo wearing white butcher’s smocks with various cuts of meat and partially burned plastic dolls strewn about them, all while the boys gleefully smiled. Various accounts say that the Beatles’ manager, Brian Epstein, and the head of Capitol Records at the time, Alan Livingston, had concerns about the use of this decidedly unusual picture, but for whatever reason, some copies were still sent out to disc jockeys and some stores ahead of the planned release date. It didn’t take long for the backlash.
According to a letter issued by Capitol, a “sampling of public opinion” said that the image was “subject to misinterpretation”. Some DJs reportedly refused to play the album on air, and teen magazine KYA Beat referred to it as “the s(l)ick humor of the Beatles” in an issue that chose to do a plain red cover instead of the picture. Capitol quickly had the Beatles do another photo shoot, in which the group posed around a steamer trunk. You can literally see the looks of disdain on their faces. One of those pictures then became the new album cover, which was pasted on over the remaining “butcher” copies that weren’t already destroyed. The result was that Yesterday… and Today became the only Beatles album to lose money for Capitol.
To this very day, rumors abound that the Beatles intended the offending photo as a statement about the Vietnam War, or that it was their protest against the way Capitol edited and re-arranged their albums. The truth seems to be that all of it was photographer Robert Whitaker’s idea. Ironically, the same type of people who took offense at the photo would’ve probably loved the concept behind it. Whitaker was shocked by crazed fan-reaction to the Beatles, whom he felt were “not an illusion, not something to be worshiped, but people as real and substantial as a piece of wood”. Comparing it all to the Biblical account of the Israelites’ worshiping a golden calf as the ten commandments were being written, Whitaker originally intended to give the photo a gold colored background and illustrated silver jeweled halos over the Beatles’ heads. Coincidentally, John Lennon’s “bigger than Jesus” comments started another controversy about a month later.
But the butcher-album “carve-up”, as Disc magazine referred to it that summer, was the first time the Beatles were involved in a real controversy. In the eyes of the media, they had lost their innocence forever. Perhaps that’s the main reason why the album is such a collector’s item today. John Lennon once joked that an original copy could be sold for $11 million, but a near-mint stereo copy that was featured in an episode of Antiques Roadshow sold for just over $10,500 at auction recently. There are websites devoted to the entire controversy, how to peel a “trunk cover” off of a “butcher cover”, or alternately, why they should be left on, and tie-in merchandise ranging from posters, matchbooks, and reproduction covers, but the music is rarely ever mentioned. http://www.popmatters.com/feature/115699-yesterday…and-today-today/
So, I read through some of my commentary and found that the link to an article on the Beatles was missing. I did a Google search found it, but also found Sophia Smallstorm’s interview with Mike Williams. He was there to review a book “Paul Is Dead – The Memoirs of Billy Shears” that he feels is an authentic “confession” by Billy Shears telling all about “what happened to Paul McCartney” in a YouTube video entitled, “The Death Of Paul McCartney – September 11, 1966”
Who has done a lot of research on the Beatles phenomenon and in particular the fact that Paul Is Dead or PID. I watched the video out of curiosity as I have seen other videos of her in the past. She is quite deliberate and thorough in her research but this was a video of her podcast of an individual speaking on a topic she had little or no research experience into herself. I was struck by the content of this video and hence my video commentary was selected. I do believe I am divinely guided when I chose a topic for my videos. I have to have a certain passion arise up within that will spur me on and make my thoughts flow seamlessly. Luckily, I work for myself and can choose topics that I feel driven about. I will leave a link to here video as well. It aired September 15, 2016.
This interview is very compelling and everyone should take a moment and watch it. It speaks volumes about our time today, but also about those times back in the 60’s. As I mentioned before in my previous video, the NOW is not new at all. The plan has been in place for centuries. It has many tentacles that stretch very, very far into the minds, hearts and spirits of all its actors. Some actors feel they are more in charge than others, but nevertheless there is a hidden hand behind it all.
In this video, I also want to comment on the movie called PaulMcCartney Really Is Dead: The Last Testament of George Harrison.Highway 61 Entertainment has produced this unauthorized documentary that includes this newly unearthed evidence. Some say it was a hoax or spoof film but this film made me wonder and offered some substance to the theory as far as I am concerned.
I must admit I had Beatle Mania. It was a very interesting psychological phenomenon. My mother would just look at me in wonderment, as I would swoon, cry and even get faint. Ha, that was funny when I think about it. Were we the lost generation, looking for a reason to love passionately some pop stars we had never met with mop hairstyles? They seemed to dare to be different.
It was quite believable back then.
I remember this. It was during my last year of high school and first year of college. We got caught one night in our college dorm when someone brought us the album “Abby Road”. If you ever had an experience that shifted you so greatly that you can go back to that moment years later, that was the type of experience that was. We were so spooked that night and we actually thought we saw Paul’s ghostly shadow in the hallway as it passed the window on the first floor of our dormitory. We huddled around and listened to the music being played backwards, which had to be done manually and we cringed in horror! How could this be? It took us a few days to settle down, but there were a few die-hards who continued to persist in the truth of the conspiracy, so much so that the album became “taboo” and we stopped listening to it. Eventually we went on with our lives, but that day never left me, nor did I feel the same about the Beatles or Paul anymore.
In today’s world looking back on that and how the entertainment industry has the mystique of the occult and hidden hands that pull the strings of the so-called “talented ones” who have meteoric fame with little talent, it causes one to pause. Was Paul the sacrifice so that the band could become as famous as they did, practically over night? Did Paul decide that he would take the “plunge” and go along with this scheme to say he was dead as a “marketing ploy” to sell more albums? Did Paul really die and they needed to tell the world by implanting backwards words and music into their albums as a way to start a new “mind control” trend? Think about it. That was back in the 60’s, who ever heard of these guys, then all of a sudden they were having folks cry and faint over them. What was the real secret to their fame?
With what we know now, I would say that many of the above mentioned scenarios may apply, if not all and some others, I did not mention.
He was my favorite Beatle, but something did change about him and if this “film” has even the slightest bit of credence, then there very well may have been a deep conspiracy.
That they cared so much about people killing themselves over his “presumed” death is a bit of a stretch for me, although there were some reports of that when Michael Jackson died, but seriously… that part of the story almost made me stop watching the film. I watched it though, because I was there, and I wanted to see what other unknown clues they had. All in all, the film was quite interesting. Is it true? Well, maybe someone will come forward with the real evidence in time, then again, maybe not. Countless secrets have met the grave, and with Paul being the Only Beatle left, and he’s 80 years old.. Well if he breathed a word about it, we may be calling it a death bed confession.
Sofia Smallstorm & Mike Williams – The Death Of Paul McCartney – September 11, 1966 (Sept 2016)
ForbiddenKnowledgeTV Alexandra Bruce March 6, 2015
In this mockumentary spoof of “Paul-Is-Dead” theories, a mysterious voice on the tape reveals a secret Beatles history, chronicling McCartney’s fatal car accident, the cover up, and dozens of never-before-revealed clues, exposing “Paul McCartney” as an impostor!
Highway 61 Entertainment has produced this unauthorized documentary that includes this newly unearthed evidence.
NB Commentary: The Internet is a blaze with all manner of memes, information, disinformation, misinformation and out right lies about the phenomenon presently called pizza-gate. Why?
Is it because we have found out that our so-called public officials have indulged in such debauchery and now we are all appalled?
Is it because mainstream media is using the tactic of crying out against “fake news”?
Is it because people just can’t even imagine the abuse of small children to such a large degree?
Is it because it has gone on for so long and people have been killed when they attempt to uncover it or have blatantly discovered it without any contest? (Ted Gunderson and
Centre County Attorney, Ray Gricar, went missing while investigating
the Sandusky child sex abuse ring, for example, along with many others who died mysteriously when investigating this.)
Is it because people who have strong religious leaning can push their agenda and claim that going back to Jesus will save us all from this hideous activity?
Is it because people are appalled that anyone would do what they, in their own hearts have dreamed about, imagined or even attempted to do but pulled back because it was soooo wrong in their estimation? Besides, what if they got found out.
Stay with me here….. I am going to take you on a journey. A journey that goes cross
cultures into the deep recesses of the very spiritual/religious leanings that humans have used to feel sanctified and above reproach.
Now, let’s look at the psyops aspect of it first.
What is a Psysops? It’s commonly known as Psychological Operations. The definition is as follows.
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender and enemy populations to capitulate.
As the flip-side to the ancient wisdom that knowledge is key to all successful warfare strategies, the art of deliberately sewing deception has been understood and practiced for thousands of years.
But.. Psychological operations can range in scope from those that heal and those that harm. Some may simply be benign. The mind is being manipulated for some reason or other, by another, or maybe even by the individual themselves who may play mind games on him/herself and those around them.
For example, a person may rent a very expensive car, drive it through the neighborhood, show up on their neighbor’s doorstep, show off their car and drive away. In that instance, those who do not know the origin of the car would surmise this person had money. Why, because it would take a heap of money to own such a vehicle. From there they would brag to their friends or shall I say report to their friends that “So and So” has a heap of money. “So and So” drives off having psychically manipulated their perception of reality. He has performed a psyops.. Or con game as it is commonly called when the government is not involved.
So, how often have we, in our individual lives, perpetrated a fraud for the purpose of managing perception of ourselves by others? Women may use make-up, men may build muscle… all in all it’s about creating a perception, a persona, a concept. But is any of it real?
Most times people relate to psyops as something that is done for nefarious reasons, they seldom look in the mirror to ask themselves how many times have they engaged in the same behavior.
Now, let’s look at pedophilia… which mainly eludes to illicit sex with children by adults. Children who in most cases, not all, are remiss and resistant to it. Now, turn around and look at the sexualization of children, particularly in western societies. I do realize that this is not a Western Phenomenon, only.
Far from it, but it is blatantly apparent in the Western World. How often do we as parents, adults, etc, encourage our children to embrace the habits, ways and dress of adults? How many of us expose our children to all manner of behavior through television, movies and print media? Have we ever thought about how this primes them to become “sex slaves” as it were?
Why do we over-sexualize our children? Why do we allow them to view and or engage in sexual promiscuity via the media and in this day and age, YouTube animations that are supposedly designed for children but have so many sexual overtones it’s unbelievable.
I always say, this is an adult world. We birth our children into it and scare them to death the entire time they are here. We don’t protect them, or shield them from that which would harm them most. And in this case, we don’t teach them boundaries and give them consciousness that will help them to determine what is good or safe touch and what is not. We get caught up in the fanfare and notoriety and celebrity madness. We allow them to see half naked women in suggestive poses and we applaud their nakedness. We allow them to listen to music that is sensational and very, very sexual. Therefore we prime them to the point where they know no boundaries or are confused about boundaries between adults and children, thus they are easily manipulated to get into the car or bed of a stranger and/or relative.
We allow them to dance suggestively with each other and with adults. We don’t teach them the appropriate behavior which is really a safe behavior in essence.
Ironically, those folks who want to change this and demand toy manufactures, modeling agencies, media moguls, entertainment, etc., to stop over sexualizing the children would need to go to their respective representatives in the hopes of getting them to enact legislation that would crack down on these exploitive practices. Sadly, too many of them are indulgent and would be too weak to stand against it, may be too afraid to do so, or may simply ignore the outcry do to their own complicity.
Now, to the spiritual/religious/cultural overtones here.
If we go back to the beginning, well, let’s just go to the Bible for starters… Adam
and Eve had two sons, Cain and Abel. According to the story, Cain killed Abel and was exiled. Where did he go and if there was only Adam and Eve, surely he died of loneliness, but I digress.
Let’s go back to Adam and Eve. With their one son at first and then more children coming after, how did they procreate? It would have had to been incestuous quite frankly if we go by the story. If not, then there had to have been more than one Adam and One Eve. If we stick with the Bible story, then we are clearly seeing the population increase through some type of incestuous relationships between parents and siblings because it would have taken many more people to bring the entire human race into existence. Would it not??
And let’s just take a brief look at this terminology. “The Sons of God came unto the daughters of men and there were giants n the land.” Were the sons adults and the daughters children? Were the Sons children and the daughters children and if so, how did they procreate, and create giants no less.
And just a little note about Noah and his family.
Clearly there had to have been incestuous relationships between the family members in order to re-populate the earth after the great flood.
Now, let’s go to Greece… We have many stories of the Greek Gods incestuous relationships. Mothers having children with sons, Fathers having sex with daughters.. Children being sister/brother wives. I won’t detail the instance, you can look that up for yourself. Gods eating their children.
If the Gods did it, then why not humans? Would doing it make you more Godly or closer to God?
It can be dismissed as just myth and lore, but can it really??
It’s a psyops. It shapes perception of reality.
And let’s not talk about Santa Claus and his eminent domain to invade peoples homes all around the world, but I digress again.
Let’s go back to Egypt or Khemet as it has also been referred to. Here we find the same thing happening. Mothers giving birth to children after having intercourse with their son. We have brother and sister husband and wives. We have another culture of incestuous relationships that are documented on the walls of antiquity and glossed over as if it makes no difference at all. It is another Psyops.
Even in African spirituality there are instances where the story goes… Mother mates with her son to bring forth others.
Around the world in small communities where there are no others for miles and miles and miles, there has to be co-mingling among them in order for them to survive. If restrictions were placed upon them that kept them from interbreeding, they would essentially die out, would they not?
Stay with me here.
Now, if co-mingling with relatives is part of human nature, or human society going back centuries, then to scoff at it now is disingenuous or is it not?
Religious and societal sanctions began to emerge over time to relegate the close inter-breeding and marrying between close relatives and even siblings as a sin or deviant, punishable by those in authority. The Catholic Church went so far as to say, you can marry your second cousin but no one closer than that.
Now, let’s look at Pedophilia. It is commonly believed that pedophilia is an act upon a AN UNWILLING child by an adult.
Now, let’s look at the psyops aspect of this. More than likely an adult has lured the child and convinced the child that it is safe, especially if it wants to keep the child participating. Of course there are instances of child abductions and the child is screaming and cryin gand trying to break free. However, I would wager that is not the norm in these so-called pedophile rings. The screaming fear and chaos comes later on after the child has been primed.
When an individual engages in sex, certain energies are released. These energies create a type of nirvana upon climax and Endorphine are released causing a feeling of peace and tranquility. If the individual is under duress, the climax may happen but is short lived and then it becomes a high that is chased after for the duration. Many people become sex addicts do to the pleasure they derive from the sex act and the momentary feeling of nirvana at the point of climax. It gets distorted when a child is involved as the child cannot emit a corresponding energy as an adult would, therefore it’s like only getting an ounce of nirvana when a gallon is required.
So why do they do it? Because it becomes an addiction and like any other addiction they run after it. The child is emitting an energy of fear, trepidation, anxiety, anger, confusion, etc. which can also provide a momentary shot. Therefore they have to have a lot of children to get the full “hit” or so they think. There is no full hit, there is only fragmented beings, being used in a fragmented and distorted way.. Emitting fragmented and distorted energies causing a fragmented and distorted addiction.
In modern society, the sexualization of children offers many options for those who have the inclination toward pedophilia.
1) they can fantasize in private
2) they can get closer to the object of their fantasy by attending child beauty pageants
3) they can become advocates for the safety of children while secretly molesting them
4) it normalizes the sexual admiration of a child thru publicity
5) it fosters credence build on this acceptance and thus it pardons those who actively participate in pedophilic acts
6) it can be used as a tool for blackmail especially for those who are wealthy and/or in high office,
7) it normalizes a rape culture
8) it normalizes child abuse on varying levels.
9)due to the secrecy involved, it allows this behavior to go on unimpeded for decades even centuries when coupled with trauma it release an addictive energetic frequency driving the pedophile to the point of an insane insatiable appetite for the experience.
10)it erodes the fabric of a society rendering it extremely harmful to its members which could lead to total collapse of its viability to sustain its most vulnerable, the children
11)the children who manage to grow up are severely emotionally, mentally, physically and spiritually damaged, may become perpetrators themselves and/or become psychotic
12)this psychosis acts like a virus and spreads to the other members of society creating a poisonous frequency on a psychic level that without the total dismantling of the distortion the society becomes a cesspool of discordant, destructive energies.
What I am saying is this, pedophilia and incest is a part of human history and cultures. Presently it may be demonized in some and herald in others, however, if we go back to the spiritual and fundamental origins of it, we can trace it back thousands upon thousands of years. Children have been used in blood sacrifices, thrown to the volcano, sacrificed to the goods for a harvest and eaten for longevity. If we look deep enough we may find that the rise and fall of so-called great civilizations had and intimate relationship with the rise and fall of these acts against its children.
The question is, Why??
The Occult Cult of Celebrity and the Erosion of the Self.
What is it about human nature that makes humans susceptible to this behavior towards its young? Is it the lore, the myth or the taboo? In some instances these acts made a person closer to the Gods, garnered them favor, staved off famine and earth change catastrophes.
Remember, Abraham who was told by his God to sacrifice his son to prove his faithfulness? That was not unusual for that to happen. Human sacrifice was not rare. They say Yeshuwa was the last “human sacrifice” and yet people eat his body and drink his blood, every Sunday. Think about that.
Where does this come from? Why are humans cannibals? Why do they kill their children? Why do they eat their young thinking it will elongate their own lives? Why do the molest and rape them?
To Me this predilection is the real psyops, the real rabbit hole. Somewhere along the way, humanity has been hardwired to indulge in this type of behavior. Whether out in the open in certain cultures or in secret dark rooms, tunnels and dungeons in others. One of the reasons it won’t stop is because it is in us. It is in all of us.
If we are all God’s creatures, made by God, then why did God create us this way? Even animals protect their young. They do not set up altars to ritualistically kill them. And only when they have matured do they enter into sexual behavior with them. I once had a cat who had several kittens. One of her kittens continued to nurse past the time needed and would get an erection while nursing his mother. Whenever he came near her she would quickly push him away. Of course animals are not always the greatest examples to draw from, but they at least don’t seem to need to appease the Gods by sacrificing their children.
Some scholars prefer the term sacred sex to sacred prostitution in cases where payment for services was not involved. The Greek term hierodoulos or hierodulehas sometimes been taken to mean sacred holy woman, but it is more likely to refer to a former slave freed from slavery in order to be dedicated to a god. The Hebrew term qedesha is often translated literally as temple holy one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_prostitution
Plato was an early critic of sexual intercourse in pederastic relationships, proposing that men’s love of boys avoid all carnal expression and instead progress from admiration of the lover’s specific virtues to love of virtue itself in abstract form. While copulation with boys was often criticized and seen as shameful and brutish, other aspects of the relationship were considered beneficial, as indicated in proverbs such as A lover is the best friend a boy will ever have. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty
Though pederasty was once accepted in many cultures, some modern observers have retrospectively labeled it abusive. Enid Bloch argues that many Greek boys who were involved in paederastic relationships may have been harmed by the experience, if the relationship included anal sex. Bloch writes that the boy may have been traumatized by knowing that he was violating social customs. According to her, the “most shameful thing that could happen to any Greek male was penetration by another male.” In this respect Bloch is in accord with Greek sexual morality, which also recognized a difference between ethical pederasty which excluded anal sex and “hubristic” pederasty which was believed to debase the boy as well as the man who penetrated him.
Bloch further argues that vases showing “a boy standing perfectly still as a man reaches out for his genitals” indicate the boy may have been “psychologically immobilized, unable to move or run away.” Many other vases show the boy running away.
Every year, the priests of Ishtar would impregnate young virgins on an altarannu dedicated to herself and her husband*. The children were born on Christmas (!!!), and the next year they were sacrificed in the Easter’s Sunday at the sunrise service. The priests would take Ishtar’s eggs and dye them in the blood of the sacrificed children.
*Inanna’s husband was none other that the infamous god Moloch or Melekh, to whom children were – and still are – sacrificed in Satanic rituals. Satanism is the religious worship of the Anunnaki, and the human and animal sacrifices were/are part of the rituals.
“… the oldest, most pristine form of Satanism, the old Sumero-Akkadian-Babylonian mystery religion …Inherent in this culture is the presence and power of demonic spirits, and they became an integral part of my life and even my being. In a culture addicted to power, demonic spirits offered the ultimate power trip. If, in American culture, people are addicted to comfort, status, and prestige, in Satanic culture people are addicted to demonic power.
“Satanism has pervaded western civilization …It has been growing for thousands of years, quietly weaving its way through the very fabric of the culture and the power structures of the nations in the West. It has adherents in all walks of life, in all incomes, and all social strata. It has exerted a profound influence on the intellectual life of the West for the past several hundred years …Satanism has influenced politics, economics, art and music, through the spiritual-psychological process called dissociation, and dissociation is as old as human culture itself.”4 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/matrix/matrix14.htm
There are so many questions and the more you know the more there is to know. But at this point in the journey it can be firmly stated that there is a considerable reptilian connection to ancient and modern control and manipulation of the human race. That is not to say all reptilians in all existence, just some of them. But then we need to ask about the consciousness that incarnates into the reptilian stream because in the end the decisions of action and behavior are taken by consciousness.
John A. Keel points out that historical records say the priests claimed to have the ability to communicate with other-dimensional beings, and that the kings and emperors, including people like Julius Caesar and Napoleon, met with strange beings who materialized and dematerialized. The same goes with today’s leaders who consult their other-dimensional demonic masters. Keel details the literature on secret societies that describes many materializations of fearsome demons, which gave out orders and directed their followers to commit murder or political manipulation. Those who disobeyed would be killed by the entity or fellow members.
“Thus,” he wrote, “the ultraterrestrials are able to guide and control human events through evil men lusting for power.”8
Exactly. Keel goes on:
“…The startling truth, as carefully recorded by the ancient historians, is that ultraterrestrials have always been in direct contact with millions of individuals and that they actually ruled directly over mankind for many years. In recent centuries their influence has become more subtle, but it is always there.”9
Only by understanding the nature of the infinite frequencies or densities of existence can we begin to see the plot. We are being controlled and manipulated on this planet from other dimensions or densities and have been for thousands of years, at least.
The well known writer and researcher on “UFO” topics, Dr Jacques Vallee, asked the right questions when he said:
“Are we dealing…with a parallel universe, where there are human races living, and where we may go at our expense, never to return to the present? Are these races only semi-human, so that in order to maintain contact with us, they need crossbreeding with men and women of our planet?
Is this the origin of the many tales and legends where genetics plays a great role: the symbolism of the Virgin in occultism and religion, the fairy tales involving human midwives and changelings, the sexual overtones of the flying saucer reports, the biblical stories of intermarriage between the Lord’s angels and terrestrial women, whose offspring were giants?
From that mysterious universe, have objects that can materialize and ‘dematerialize’ at will been projected? Are the UFOs ‘windows’ rather than ‘objects’? There is nothing to support these assumptions, and yet, in view of the historical continuity of the phenomenon, alternatives are hard to find, unless we deny the reality of ail the facts, as our peace of mind would indeed prefer.”10 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/matrix/matrix14.htm>
But humans are doing precisely this to each other every day by demanding that everyone conform to the norms to which they blindly conform. This is nothing less than psychological fascism – the thought police with agents in every home, everywhere. Agents so deeply conditioned that most have no idea they are unpaid mind controllers. “I’m just doing what’s right for my children” I hear them say.
No, what you have been programmed to believe is right for them and the belief, also, that only you know best. I remember debating with a former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom at the Oxford Union debating society and he simply could not see a difference between education and indoctrination. It was a wonder to behold.
We see this same theme in our daily experiences of people in uniform and others from the masses who are promoted to power over the masses. It’s summed up by the satirical version of the British Labour Party song, The Red Flag, which goes:
“The working class can kiss my arse, I’ve got the foreman’s job at last.”
I’m a self-declared life long student enrolled in a study of history, civilization, and comparative mythology. One of the most fascinating subjects, almost taboo to discuss, is to look with morbid curiosity on the practice of blood offerings….be it lovely doves or gentle lambs, but especially, humans, and even more so…. innocent human children. We ponder the mystery of a superstitious culture when we view the image of a delicate child mummy sacrificed thousands of years ago in some pre-Colombian ritual. We contemplate what kind of human need there was for this sort of dark practice, and if the seeds of this need lurk in us still today, passed genetically from an ancestor who lived hundreds and thousands of years ago. This ritualistic killing was usually associated with appeasing a god, often to ensure a good harvest. However, no culture is exempt from this practice.
He’s talking about parents sacrificing their children to idol gods—a practice that was quite common in ancient times. Multiple gods got in on the ritual, and if you were really in a desperate situation, you might try offering up your kid to a god who you didn’t normally give that type of offering to. But some gods—such as the Ammonite god named Molek—required child sacrifice on a regular basis, which is why the ancient Jews had set aside a whole ravine near the city of Jerusalem to serve as an ongoing child barbecue. Children were burned alive on super-heated metal idol arms, and you can just imagine how unpleasant the smells and sounds of such a practice would be. It was the infamous Valley of Ben Hinnom which Jesus later used as a metaphor for what Hell would be like: a fire that never dies, weeping and anguish, a foul stench. When Jesus talks about Gehenna in the Gospel books, He’s referring to Ben Hinnom. When Yahweh speaks of Tophet in the Old Testament books, He’s referring to the actual altar in the valley where children were physically killed. Clearly this whole practice was horrific and disturbing on every level. But it was also going on all of the time and right next to the most famous city in Israel. Jerusalem was a major trade center, a very popular worship center, and a key cultural landmark. Yet if you come to Jerusalem, you end up getting a faceful of Tophet, and how are you not disturbed by such a thing? You see, the Jews weren’t trying to hide what they were doing. It’s more like they were intentionally doing it on a grand stage which was strategically located in a place where no one could miss it. Yes, we Christians certainly do want to know that our good Gods are horrified by such a terrible practice, so we feel good when we read about Yahweh exclaiming His horror of this practice not just once, but three times in the book of Jeremiah.
Now wait a second. Here’s Yahweh telling Abraham to barbecue Isaac on some rocks many centuries before the prophet Jeremiah was even born. Suddenly Yahweh’s three claims to have never commanded child sacrifice are sounding disturbingly hypocritical. And then there was that trick He pulled on Jephthah—a guy who vowed to give Yahweh a special sacrifice in return for Yahweh giving Jephthah a miraculous military victory.
Jephthah lived on a farm and had his share of animals. He was used to coming home and having some four-legged thing run to meet him. So when he promised to roast the first creature to greet him when he returned from battle, he figured he was striking up a pretty safe bargain with God. But it turned out that Yahweh didn’t appreciate having His help being treated so cheaply, so after giving Jephthah the victory he wanted, Yahweh made sure that it was Jephthah’s own daughter who outran all of the animals on the day that Jephthah returned from battle. Shocked and horrified by the unexpected turn of events, Jephthah recognized that God was disciplining him for his bad attitude, and he dutifully sacrificed his daughter. So now we have two incidents of Yahweh requiring child sacrifice: one was a direct command, the other was through a manipulation of circumstances. In the case of Abraham, Yahweh called the sacrifice off before it was completed. But in the case of Jephthah, the young woman went down without any Divine intervention. Do these stories bother us? Of course they do. Jephthah’s disturbing account is sandwiched right between the stories of Gideon and Samson—two characters who get frequent mention in Sunday School classes. Yet we consistently skip over Jephthah’s three chapters (Judges 10-12), because it’s just too upsetting to think that Yahweh would ever really want child sacrifice.
Now even if Yahweh didn’t have any history of demanding child sacrifice from His followers, it is beyond ludicrous for a sovereign God to claim that His own creatures can ever do anything which hasn’t occurred to Him. It is our Gods who set the limits on who we humans are and define all of our capacities. We can’t just sit around brainstorming original ideas. Like children who are choosing a cookie from a plate that mom has set out, we can only ever choose among possibilities that our Gods have made available to us. So no, child sacrifice really wasn’t a human original. Not only did Yahweh conceive of the possibility long before we did, but He also designed us with the capacity to find such a loathsome activity appealing under certain circumstances. Whose idea was it to make human beings so utterly selfish that they’d be willing trash their own family members in order to get some god to send rain down on their thirsty crops? Who designed human parents to feel bonded to their own offspring, yet ensured that that bond could also be eroded under certain circumstances? It was our three glorious Creators who designed us to be the selfish, sadistic little creatures that we are, and it was our Creators who taught us everything we know about evil. We humans can do nothing apart from our Gods, and we can’t comprehend anything without Them making our minds work.
In the Old Testament, Yahweh boasts of having absolute control over all things—including life and death. It was through the mouth of Moses that He said:
Not long after, the kids were called out to dance to the hit songs of the season – these songs in my opinion should be rated PG 13. 4-6 year olds trooped to the dance floor, miming the sexually explicit songs and gyrating their bodies in the most sensual manner. They could have given Beyounce a run for her money.
They ran their hands over their bodies, shook their booties hard while their parents cheered them on. The boys had their upper shirts unbuttoned and rapped along perfectly to gangsta raps while doing flawless break dance.
While it might appear that the audience at child pageants is comprised of family and friends of the children who compete, there’s no guarantee that strangers with nefarious intentions haven’t infiltrated the crowd. Whether pedophiles attend the pageants or simply collect the adult-looking photos that many pageant moms love to post online, the mini contestants may easily be exposed to those with a sick interest in them. There’s really no way to tell whether the friendly man taking hours of video footage in the corner is an uncle, grandfather or pedophile.
Instead of thrusting your child forward into the limelight that may cause the destruction of her confidence and send her the message that her only worth lies in how she looks, allow your child to be a child. Surround her with trusted family and friends, encourage her to participate in activities that promote her intellectual and physical abilities and, most of all, keep her away from the sordid world of child pageants.
what’s with parents who watch their little kids dance like prostitutes at parties, in front of everyone and actually cheer them on! The three or four presenters all seemed to agree and one even shared a story of how his 7 year old cousin was dancing at a party and everyone cheered, then the girl suddenly broke into some dip-it-low booty poppin’ moves and her mother immediately sprang up from her seat and dragged her off the dance floor. For me this was an Aha! moment; So I’m not insane then, I’m not the only who thinks that’s just outright wrong.
“Sorcerers chiefly used the blood sacrifice; and while we hold this to be evil, we cannot deny that this method is very efficient. Power flashes forth from newly shed blood, instead of exuding slowly as by our method. The victim’s terror and anguish add keenness, and even quite a small animal can yield enormous power.The great difficulty is in the human mind controlling the power of the lower animal mind. But sorcerers claim they have methods for effecting this and that the difficulty disappears the higher her the animal used, and when the victim is human disappears entirely. (The practice is an abomination but it is so.)