NB Commentary. For you Internet sleuths who want to know the truth and are willing to burn a little midnight oil, here are some links. These are the links that I used in my research on the “Michelle Obama Is a Man” meme. I have uncovered some valuable information and I am sure that you will find this information quite compelling.
I have placed link here from both sides of the spectrum, pros and cons. Please look into them yourself and don’t just take my word for it. You may feel you are going down a rabbit hole, but this is exactly what this type of disinformation will have you doing. Happy Trails!!!
NB Commentary:Okay People for those of you who believe that Michael LaVaughn Robinson underwent sex reassignment surgery at John Hopkins Hospital, in 1983, I will read a short clip from an article written in The News-Letter on May 1, 2014. Just so we can debunk the Christwire.org article that said that Michael Lavaughn Robinson was a football player at Oregon State University and after sex change surgery, at John Hopkins Hopkins, in 1983, legally changed his name to Michelle Robinson. Maybe this little tidbit will help quell the noise.
In 1965, the Hopkins Hospital became the first academic institution in the United States to perform sex reassignment surgeries. Now also known by names like genital reconstruction surgery and sex realignment surgery, the procedures were perceived as radical and attracted attention from The New York Times and tabloids alike. But they were conducted for experimental, not political, reasons. Regardless, as the first place in the country where doctors and researchers could go to learn about sex reassignment surgery, Hopkins became the model for other institutions.
But in 1979, Hopkins stopped performing the surgeries and never resumed.
In the 1960s, the idea to attempt the procedures came primarily from psychologist John Money and surgeon Claude Migeon, who were already treating intersex children, who, often due to chromosome variations, possess genitalia that is neither typically male nor typically female. Money and Migeon were searching for a way to assign a gender to these children, and concluded that it would be easiest if they could do reconstructive surgery on the patients to make them appear female from the outside. At the time, the children usually didn’t undergo genetic testing, and the doctors wanted to see if they could be brought up female.
“[Money] raised the legitimate question: ‘Can gender identity be created essentially socially?’ … Nurture trumping nature,” said Chester Schmidt, who performed psychiatric exams on the surgery candidates in the 60s and 70s.
This theory ended up backfiring on Money, most famously in the case of David Reimer, who was raised as a girl under the supervision of Money after a botched circumcision and later committed suicide after years of depression.
However, at the time, this research led Money to develop an interest in how gender identities were formed. He thought that performing surgery to match one’s sex to one’s gender identity could produce better results than just providing these patients with therapy.
“Money, in understanding that gender was — at least partially — socially constructed, was open to the fact that [transgender] women’s minds had been molded to become female, and if the mind could be manipulated, then so could the rest of the body,” Dana Beyer, Executive Director of Gender Rights Maryland, who came to Hopkins to consider the surgery in the 70s, wrote in an email to The News-Letter.
Surgeon Milton Edgerton, who was the head of the University’s plastic surgery unit, also took an interest in sex reassignment surgery after he encountered patients requesting genital surgery. In 2007, he told Baltimore Style: “I was puzzled by the problem and yet touched by the sincerity of the request.”
Edgerton’s curiosity and his plastic surgery experience, along with Money’s interest in psychology and Migeon’s knowledge of plastic surgery, allowed the three to form a surgery unit that incorporated other Hopkins surgeons at different times. With the University’s approval, they started performing sex reassignment surgeries and created the Gender Identity Clinic to investigate whether the surgeries were beneficial.
“This program, including the surgery, is investigational,” plastic surgeon John Hoopes, who was the head of the Gender Identity Clinic, told The New York Times in 1966. “The most important result of our efforts will be to determine precisely what constitutes a transsexual and what makes him remain that way.”
To determine if a person was an acceptable candidate for surgery, patients underwent a psychiatric evaluation, took gender hormones and lived and dressed as their preferred gender. The surgery and hospital care cost around $1500 at the time, according to The New York Times.
Beyer found the screening process to be invasive when she came to Hopkins to consider the surgery. She first heard that Hopkins was performing sex reassignment surgeries when she was 14 and read about them in Time and Newsweek.
“That was the time that I finally was able to put a name on who I was and realized that something could be done,” she said. “That was a very important milestone in my consciousness, in understanding who I was.”
When Beyer arrived at Hopkins, the entrance forms she had to fill out were focused on sexuality instead of sexual identity. She says she felt as if they only wanted to consider hyper-feminine candidates for the surgery, so she decided not to stay. She had her surgery decades later in 2003 in Trinidad, Colo.
“It was so highly sexualized, which was not at all my experience, certainly not the reason I was going to Hopkins to consider transition, that I just got up and left, I didn’t want anything to do with it,” she said. “No one said this explicitly, but they certainly implied it, that the whole purpose of this was to get a vagina so you could be penetrated by a penis.”
Beyer thinks that it was very important that the transgender community had access to this program at the time. However, she thinks that the experimental nature of the program was detrimental to its longevity.
“It had negative consequences because when it was done it was clearly experimental,” she said. “Our opponents were able to use the experimental nature of the surgery in the 60s and the 70s against us.”
By the mid-70s, fewer patients were being operated on, and many changes were made to the surgery and psychiatry departments, according to Schmidt, who was also a founder of the Sexual Behaviors Consultation Unit (SBCU) at the time. The new department members were not as supportive of the surgeries.
In 1979, SBCU Chair Jon Meyer conducted a study comparing 29 patients who had the surgery and 21 who didn’t, and concluded that those who had the surgery were not more adjusted to society than those who did not have the surgery. Meyer told The New York Times in 1979: “My personal feeling is that surgery is not proper treatment for a psychiatric disorder, and it’s clear to me that these patients have severe psychological problems that don’t go away following surgery.”
After Meyer’s study was published, Paul McHugh, the Psychiatrist-in-Chief at Hopkins Hospital who never supported the University offering the surgeries according to Schmidt, shut the program down.
Americans welcome only token numbers of people from countries devastated by U.S. wars of aggression. Donald Trump’s current ban on travelers affects nations that were already targeted by President Obama, “a perfect example of the continuity of U.S. imperial policy in the region.” The memo from State Department “dissenters” contains “not a word of support for world peace, nor a hint of respect for the national sovereignty of other peoples.”
If Americans Truly Cared About Muslims, They Would Stop Killing Them by the Millions
by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
“Since 2001, war has been normalized in the U.S. — especially war against Muslims.”
In the most dramatic expression of insider opposition to a sitting administration’s policies in generations, over 1,000 [3] U.S. State Department employees signed on to a memo protesting President Donald Trump’s temporary ban on people from seven predominantly Muslim countries setting foot on U.S. soil. Another recent high point in dissent among the State Department’s 18,000 worldwide employees occurred in June of last year, when 51 diplomats called for U.S. air strikes [4] against the Syrian government of President Bashar al Assad.
Neither outburst of dissent was directed against the U.S. wars and economic sanctions that have killed and displaced millions of people in the affected countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Rather, the diplomatic “rebellion” of last summer sought to pressure the Obama administration to join with Hillary Clinton and her “Big Tent” full of war hawks to confront Russia in the skies over Syria, while the memo currently making the rounds of State Department employees claims to uphold [5] “core American and constitutional values,” preserve “good will towards Americans” and prevent “potential damage to the U.S. economy from the loss of revenue from foreign travelers and students.”
In neither memo is there a word of support for world peace, nor a hint of respect for the national sovereignty of other peoples — which is probably appropriate, since these are not, and never have been, “core American and constitutional values.”
“The diplomatic ‘rebellion’ of last summer sought to pressure the Obama administration to join with Hillary Clinton and her ‘Big Tent’ full of war hawks to confront Russia in the skies over Syria.”
Ironically, the State Department “dissent channel” was established during one of those rare moments in U.S. history when “peace” was popular: 1971, when a defeated U.S. war machine was very reluctantly winding down support for its puppet regime in South Vietnam. Back then, lots of Americans, including denizens of the U.S. government, wanted to take credit for the “peace” that was on the verge of being won by the Vietnamese, at a cost of at least four million Southeast Asian dead. But, those days are long gone. Since 2001, war has been normalized in the U.S. — especially war against Muslims, which now ranks at the top of actual “core American values.” Indeed, so much American hatred is directed at Muslims that Democrats and establishment Republicans must struggle to keep the Russians in the “hate zone” of the American popular psyche. The two premiere, officially-sanctioned hatreds are, of course, inter-related, particularly since the Kremlin stands in the way of a U.S. blitzkrieg in Syria, wrecking Washington’s decades-long strategy to deploy Islamic jihadists as foot soldiers of U.S. empire.
The United States has always been a project of empire-building. George Washington called it a “nascent empire [6],” Thomas Jefferson bought the Louisiana Territory from France in pursuit of an “extensive empire [6],” and the real Alexander Hamilton [7], contrary to the Broadway version, considered the U.S. to be the “most interesting empire in the world.” The colonial outpost of two million white settlers (and half a million African slaves) severed ties with Britain in order to forge its own, limitless dominion, to rival the other white European empires of the world. Today, the U.S. is the Mother of All (Neo)Colonialists, under whose armored skirts are gathered all the aged, shriveled, junior imperialists of the previous era.
“The United States has always been a project of empire-building.”
In order to reconcile the massive contradiction between America’s predatory nature and its mythical self-image, however, the mega-hyper-empire must masquerade as its opposite: a benevolent, “exceptional” and “indispensible” bulwark against global barbarism. Barbarians must, therefore, be invented and nurtured, as did the U.S. and the Saudis in 1980s Afghanistan with their creation of the world’s first international jihadist network, for subsequent deployment against the secular “barbarian” states of Libya and Syria.
In modern American bureaucratese, worrisome barbarian states are referred to as “countries or areas of concern” — the language used to designate the seven nations targeted under the Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 [8] signed by President Obama. President Donald Trump used the existing legislation as the basis for his executive order banning travelers from those states, while specifically naming only Syria. Thus, the current abomination is a perfect example of the continuity of U.S. imperial policy in the region, and emphatically not something new under the sun (a sun that, as with old Britannia, never sets on U.S. empire).
The empire preserves itself, and strives relentlessly to expand, through force of arms and coercive economic sanctions backed up by the threat of annihilation. It kills people by the millions, while allowing a tiny fraction of its victims to seek sanctuary within U.S. borders, based on their individual value to the empire.
“The mega-hyper-empire must masquerade as its opposite: a benevolent, “exceptional” and “indispensible” bulwark against global barbarism.”
Donald Trump’s racist executive order directly affects about 20,000 people [9], according to the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees. President Obama killed an estimated 50,000 Libyans in 2011, although the U.S. officially does not admit it snuffed out the life of a single civilian. The First Black President is responsible for each of the half-million Syrians that have died since he launched his jihadist-based war against that country, the same year. Total casualties inflicted on the populations of the seven targeted nations since the U.S. backed Iraq in its 1980s war against Iran number at least four million — a bigger holocaust than the U.S. inflicted on Southeast Asia, two generations ago — when the U.S. State Department first established its “dissent channel.”
But, where is the peace movement? Instead of demanding a halt to the carnage that creates tidal waves of refugees, self-styled “progressives” join in the macabre ritual of demonizing the “countries of concern” that have been targeted for attack, a process that U.S. history has color-coded with racism and Islamophobia. These imperial citizens then congratulate themselves on being the world’s one and only “exceptional” people, because they deign to accept the presence of a tiny portion of the populations the U.S. has mauled.
The rest of humanity, however, sees the real face of America — and there will be a reckoning.
This video is Part 10 in a series of short videos called
“Is Michelle Obama A Man?”
NB Commentary: From the introduction through to where it all began, I have attempted to shed some light on this subject by giving a historical framework of how the Black community 50 years ago would have dealt with homosexuality and the transgender phenomenon. I hope that the information I have revealed will suggest to people who believe this meme, that quite possibly they have been hoodwinked and that from here on out they will be more circumspect in coming to conclusions about things or at least will take the time to research the source of the information so as to avoid being “Hoodwinked” as the writer of this story along with many other writers, reporters and journalist from various news outlets have done since the beginning of the concept of “telling a story” or “spreading the news.”
I want to sum it up with a few more statements, beginning with the difference between transsexual and transgender phenomenon and end this series with my concluding remarks.
Transsexuals are people who transition from one sex to another. A person born as a male can become recognizably female through the use of hormones and/or surgical procedures; and a person born as a female can become recognizably male. That said, transsexuals are unable to change their genetics and cannot acquire the reproductive abilities of the sex to which they transition. Sex is assigned at birth and refers to a person’s biological status as male or female. In other words, sex refers exclusively to the biological features: chromosomes, the balance of hormones, and internal and external anatomy. Each of us is born as either male or female, with rare exceptions of those born intersex who may display characteristics of both sexes at birth.
Transgender, unlike transsexual, is a term for people whose identity, expression, behavior, or general sense of self does not conform to what is usually associated with the sex they were born in the place they were born. It is often said sex is a matter of the body, while gender occurs in the mind. Gender is an internal sense of being male, female, or other. People often use binary terms, for instance, masculine or feminine, to describe gender just as they do when referring to sex. But gender is more complex and encompasses more than just two possibilities. Gender also is influenced by culture, class, and race because behavior, activities, and attributes seen as appropriate in one society or group may be viewed otherwise in another.
Let me conclude by saying.
There has certainly been a lot of mystery around the Obama’s. That stands to reason without any doubt whatsoever. Several reports in the media across the board have pointed out the varying issues and concerns that shrouded the Obama Administration and it’s foreign policy of war theaters in 7 countries, tentacles stretching into their connection to the Clintons’ and John Podesta, Fast & Furious, Michelle’s horrid lunch program, Obama Care, Malia smoking weed and even the so-called elaborate vacations they took on the taxpayers’ dime.
I am certainly no fan of the Obama’s as I question anyone who would want to be the President of this corrupt country, no matter who they are. But I particularly don’t understand why anyone Black would put themselves in the position to receive the most extreme expression of racism white supremacy as they would in a role of Leader over a predominately white population that has historically been the most racist group of white folks on the planet.
However, the idea that Michelle Obama is a man is patently ludicrous when you are given more than a parroted news story found in tabloids around the internet.
I hope that this long video has brought some clarity to whomever chose to stay with me as I pulled my thoughts and research together to make this presentation and I hope that, while there me be ten thousand other things we can pull out of the closet to expose the Obama’s about, I hope that we can all agree that this right here, is not one of them.
Let’s put this one to rest and find something more productive to do with our time and energy. Without a doubt the “Michelle Psyops” has taken its place among the many false flags perpetrated on the American people for many, many years, and with the advent of the Internet and access by so many, to YouTube, we have accounts raking in huge revenues along with Christwire.org and a host of other websites, with this one.
In my mind, I wonder, what was happening in the world when this story first broke in 2011, and then what was happening in the world when it really hit the fan in 2014 and has been steadily getting more and more steam.
I started doing some research but that would take days and days because I was not aware that this “Michelle Was Born A Man” meme was even being talked about. So I did not have the awareness at the time to connect the dots. So if any of you out there have any insights feel free to drop me a comment.
It seems that stories like this one an others, i.e. Flat Earth, Nibiru, the Rapture, and terrorists cells next door, are huge distractions thrown at the American Public to overshadow the Big Elephant in the room. Couple that with the enormous number of mass shootings, many of which have been uncovered as false flags and we end up with a Plethora of psyops that are often perpetrated by internet trolls and News outlets, to keep the American people reeling from pillar to post in fear and trepidation. The real issues get swept under the rug while the American people banter over the ridiculous.
Like Mr. Butvidas, founder of Christwire.org said.
“Let’s write stuff to expose how stupid people are.”
And let me further quote the Christwire.org co-founder, “Mr. Watson who said,
“There’s just rampant idiocy in the media sometimes. People watch their favorite news channels, don’t question it and will regurgitate it the next day at the office. That is no good at all.”
Meanwhile, I will be holding on to may hat for the roller-coaster ride, called “The Trump Administration.” Time for a pizza and a beer to watch this one unfold…
NB Commentary: You know, there’s an old saying that says, the Obvious is just not Obvious to the uninformed. So along with Michelle being a man, she is now leaving Obama cause she is mad at him and has been mad for years, and now that her gravy train has come to an end she don’t want him no more!! WTH?
There has to be 10 thousand videos on this topic and now mine will be 10 thousand and one because it just has to be said and somebody has to say it!
Listen folks, if you all want to believe, say and parrot that the Obama’s was a fake family and that everything about them was fake, do you think that they got into the white House without the support of the Alphabet Agencies? How were they able to pull off all the fakery without getting exposed all the way to the white house?
Isn’t it obvious that they had some “friends” in high places, and just like the media was complicit in covering up Hillary’s crimes, the same media was just as complicit in covering up Obama’s.
What gets me about you people, with all this conjecture, is you only look at the surface issues. You seldom go beneath the surface and ask the hard questions. Like, who financed Obama into the campaign for the White House? A man hardly known, with little experience and a very mysterious background, yet he was elected President? Why and how did that happen?
You people keep voting these folks in then you shit on them when they don’t follow suit with your preconceived notions of what and how they should be.
Why do you even vote at all, why do you waste your time voting and then spend countless hours complaining and finding fault with the person you voted for.
Obama did not get into the white house without some help from some very high or should I say “low” places. Those are the culprits you should be going after. Not the Puppet, Go after the Puppeteers and hold them to account.
How many times have we seen arranged marriages in hollyweird, in sports and in politics. Even in the churches, folks do stuff for show and behind the scenes they are doing something else. Have you forgotten about the “Bush Jr.” parties at the white house, or the womanizing that JFK did on his wife?
It amazes me how you guys can go on and on and on about the Obama’s and yet never look back into history to see how THEY ALL DO THAT SHIT!! I don’t want to say that you all are just singling him out because you are racists, so let me just say that you guys are the most uninformed bunch of folks about how this corrupt government functions and if you even think that Trump is gonna be any better, well, like I said before and I will say it again, he is the period at the end of the sentence.
Also, keep in mind that when you make deals with the “Shadow Government” they do promise you a rose garden. Look at how rich the Clinton’s got “after” they left the White House. Hmmmmmmm.
So, you all belly aching about how much money she ain’t gonna be able to spend after she leaves the white house, please.. She will be well taken care of and so will Barack, they played that game all too well and they know too much about the inside of the creepy place called Capital Hill, and they do not need them to turn whistle blower, and have to kill them off and surely cause a stink. So they will keep them nice and comfy until they are of no use to them anymore just like they did the Clinton’s.
You folks really make me laugh at how gullible and uninformed you all are about the very thing that you have to live and suffer under each and every day.
WAKE UP PEOPLE, THIS IS NOT KANSAS! THIS SHIT IS FUCKED!
This is a prison planet and it’s time to get out before it’s too late.
I guess when you elevate a person to the position of “God-lebrity” then you feel justified to tear them down because you realize they are only there because you put them there.
‘Michelle would divorce me!’ Obama on why he would not run for third term as president http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/725103/president-obama-michelle-divorce-third-term Obama’s Marriage In 2017: The ‘D’-Word! http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/shock-massive-bombshell-obamas-marriage-2017-d-word/ Obama’s image has been carefully crafted since even before his ghostwritten autobiographies. Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod have cautiously protected this image, which is why a divorce isn’t allowed to happen while Obama remains in the White House. But it appears their marriage is quickly dissolving, and we will all know the truth soon http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/shock-massive-bombshell-obamas-marriage-2017-d-word/ A controversial biography of President Obama made waves in May 2012 by claiming that Michelle Obama considered divorcing her politician husband years before he ran for president. A White House spokesman quickly dismissed the allegations as “nonsense,” but not before the Internet broke out with criticism and speculation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/16/obama-divorce-five-other-_n_1528496.html But is it true? The unauthorized biography, which Klein claims is based on nearly 200 interviews, has been dismissed by presidential spokesperson Eric Schultz. On Monday, Schultz told the Washington Examiner, “Ed Klein has a proven history of reckless fabrication in order to sell books. Nobody in their right mind would believe the nonsense in this one.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/17/obama-divorce-new-biography-_n_1525671.html According to the book, Michelle told France’s first lady Carla Bruni Sarkozy, 41, that she absolutely detests her role as America’s first lady, blasting it as “hell,” and admitting: “I can’t stand it!” During the Obama’s quarrel, “Michelle collapsed in tears and even threatened to divorce Barack if he seeks a second term as president,” a source in the nation’s capital told The ENQUIRER. “At one point, Michelle was heard yelling, ‘I hate you for dragging me through all this…I’ve had enough!’” http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/michelle-obama-ive-had-enough/
FIRST FAMILY FEUD! Barack & Michelle Obama’s Marriage Meltdown — How It’s Costing Taxpayers Millions! By J.R. Taylor Posted on Mar 31, 2016 @ 11:20AM http://www.nationalenquirer.com/photos/barack-michelle-obama-divorce-secrets-scandals/ Meanwhile, there were rumours that things are not what they appear between the president and the First Lady of America. According to National Enquirer, the First Lady has gained around 100 pounds in the past few months, which has led to issues in her marriage. http://www.morningnewsusa.com/barack-michelle-obama-divorce-red-flags-brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-split-23106687.html However, according to a report by the Gossip Cop, the news is a hoax and that the couple is still going strong. According to a White House insider, there is no marital problem between the president and the First Lady, and that Obama did not ask his wife to lose weight. http://www.morningnewsusa.com/barack-michelle-obama-divorce-red-flags-brad-pitt-angelina-jolie-split-23106687.html Who would have thought that Michelle Obama and US President Barack Obama will eventually face a marital problem after all the years of publicly showing off their affection to each other? Are they just faking it or not? According to a tabloid magazine, National Enquirer, Michelle Obama is outrage with her husband Barack Obama that leads her to declaring that she “wanted out” of his life. http://www.gamenguide.com/articles/80199/20161202/michelle-calls-barack-obama-loser-and-idiot-president-fires-back-with-divorce.htm Michelle Obama just filed for DIVORCE – According to reports around World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot9vbGIMzDE Michelle Obama just filed for DIVORCE – According to Reports! – 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsKKNhW_eDc Will Barack and Michelle Obama get a divorce after he leaves office? This is a serious question, as there have been multiple reports, especially in the foreign media, that their marriage is on the rocks. In the US, the main source is the National Enquirer. However, keep in mind that the National Enquirer is more often than not right about such kinds of things. It was certainly right about Edwards’ affair and child, even though the national press in the US denied it. https://www.quora.com/Will-Barack-and-Michelle-Obama-get-a-divorce-after-he-leaves-office Dan Holliday, works at Recruiting Written Jan 30, 2014 There simply isn’t any evidence that the Obamas have a struggling marriage. It’s certainly possible that they do, and it’s certainly possible that they’ll split up, just as it’s possible that any couple will divorce at some point in the future. But based on the real evidence that we have, there is no reason to conclude that the First Couple are struggling in their marriage right now. Also, did you just quote the National Enquirer? Wow. https://www.quora.com/Will-Barack-and-Michelle-Obama-get-a-divorce-after-he-leaves-office Joe Willmore Written Sep 3, 2015 Hmmm…”the National Enquirer is more often than not right…”
These are headlines from previous National Enquirers: –“Members of Congress are Aliens” –“Alien Bible Found” –“Town in Panic Over 2,000 UFO Sightings” –“Secret Service Say Bush Uses Cocaine” –“Philip Seymour Hoffman: Hidden Gay Life” (they lost a libel suit over that one) –Or there’s the classic case where Carol Burnet sued over an article claiming she was intoxicated when meeting Henry Kissinger. –Or the settlements with Cher. Or Elizabeth Taylor (two of them). –Or the claim that a stripper was having an affair with George W. Bush when he was in the WH and that his wife was going to divorce him (gee, I guess they made up).
I can’t predict the future. But I have seen no evidence indicating that there is marital discord between the Obamas. They actually seem to have a health marriage. And they actually seem to have done a pretty good job of raising two young daughters in the WH fishbowl.
Rumors of affairs, with males and females, surround Barack Obama and the icing on the cake according to multiple sources and pushed by the National Enquirer, was Barack’s over-the-top blatant flirting with Denmark’s prime minister, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, in South Africa for the memorial service for Nelson Mandela, going as far as taking a “selfie” with her while Michelle sat to the side looking angered at his antics. http://www.americancrisis.us/Article.php?ID=459546&R=2& Not for the first time in their 22-year marriage the Obamas are approaching what should be a happy family milestone under a cloud of rampant tabloid innuendo, summed up by a National Enquirer headline: “World exclusive: Obama marriage explodes!”. https://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/blogs/news/11522385-foreign-press-reporting-obama-marriage-problems-and-rumors OBAMA FAMILY CRISIS: BARACK OBAMA AND MICHELLE SET TO DIVORCE January 19, 2014 · by Abdikarim Hussein · in News, People, Society. For the past couple of weeks, the National Enquirer has been publishing prominent stories claiming that the marriage of President and Mrs. Obama is in deep trouble, and that after his term in office is over, she will file divorce papers https://krazyinsidekenya.wordpress.com/2014/01/19/obama-family-crisis-barack-obama-and-michelle-set-to-divorce/ ‘On the other hand,’ Hamada added, ‘if you get his wife to talk, she’ll tell you: “The president is a pathological philanderer. He uses the Secret Service for this, and has used them to hide evidence that he’s a cheater”.’ Some of Hamada’s claims appear to closely mirror a January report from the National Enquirer. The tabloid reported in January that the Obamas are sleeping in separate bedrooms and have determined that the president will return to Hawaii in January 2017, while Mrs. Obama and their daughters will remain in Washington, D.C. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2611563/The-Obamas-failed-marriage-looming-divorce-open-secret-claims-member-Japans-parliament-president-using-Secret-Service-hide-affairs.html The ENQUIRER is reporting that a top notch team of private detectives has compiled a secret file containing incriminating new charges that President Barack Obama has cheated on his wife. The exclusive report is also saying that a hush-hush divorce dossier has been gathered for first lady Michelle Obama, giving her the ammunition she needs to pull the plug on their 21-year marriage when Obama leaves the White House in 2017. http://josephebongie.blogspot.com/2014/06/michelle-secret-divorce-file-on-obama.html#.WJPo647QeU0 Michelle Obama Asks Barack for a Divorce: Are the Affair Rumors True? Gurus Channel3 weeks ago (edited) 21 boss this is a parody. we are well aware of how much they love each other, that’s why we made something as ridiculous as this. We didn’t think that was hard to recognize. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axfoD8AVh4U
The Washington Child Sex Ring Cover-up The Franklin Child Sex Ring Implicating the Bush Whitehouse! http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/boys_town_abuse.htm How many Americans would have thought this family worthy of election to so many high offices, if the mainstream media had not continued for generations to HIDE the horrible story of how the George Herbert Walker Bush family “earned” much of its wealth and power, i.e. by serving as the principal bankrollers in America of Adolf Hitler and his ” National Socialist Party”, both in its rise to power, and even after World War II was declared, with NAZI Germany on one side, and America on the other? http://liberalslikechrist.org/+Reasonable/BushFamily.html
NB Commentary: Okay Folks, this is one topic I really hesitated to weigh in on. But as usual, I get signs from the Universe as to what should be the next topic of my YouTube videos. It’s quite magical how it works and I simply go with the flow.
I am not sure how long this video will end up being. I would like to say that this will be a short video, but I doubt that I can keep to that promise. I hope that you all will stay with me and follow my train of thought all the way to the conclusion.
This video will be in 8 short parts covering each topic in a short portion of the video. I will upload it all as one video, and if you don’t have the time to watch the entire video, pause it and come back later. I may get the chance to upload it in segments, but I will not promise that. I thank you in advance for taking this journey with me.
Let me begin by saying, that there are so many things about the Obama’s that is it hard to put it into a nut shell. When it comes to transparency when it comes to their lives before their stint in the White House, you may as well be digging for a needle in a haystack. However, as much as they have had their history shrouded in mystery, anyone with a little imagination, know how and some time to spare, can do a search on the internet and get some information about them, and in this case, Michelle Obama. This video is about her and the claims that she is a Transgendered woman.
Part 1, Her Childhood
This video is Part 1 of a series of videos that discuss this very interesting and controversial topic, “Is Michelle Obama a Transgendered Woman?”
In this video we will take a look at her childhood pics and compare them to the Internet “Shocking and Irrefutable Proof” that Michelle was born a boy to “his” parents, Fraser Robinson, III and Marian Shields Robinson, Jan. 17, 1964.
Part 2, Her Marriage and Pregnancy.
This video is Part 2 of a series of videos that discuss this very interesting and controversial topic, “Is Michelle Obama a Transgendered Woman?”
In this video we will take a look at some of her wedding pics, her marriage to Barack Hussein Obama and pics of her children while they were young.
“One laughable comment I read that I would like to mention here is the idea that the children were adopted by Michael Robinson and Barack Obama from an orphanage in Morocco! After I got up off the floor from laughing so hard at how ludicrous this speculation was I had to put into words in this video that that claim is clearly out in left field. Imagine a mostly Islamic country allowing a transgendered man and her husband adopt 2 daughters. Or, two men adopt 2 girls children. Just imagine. And if it were true, just maybe, I would wager, that they would sell two girls to these two guys before they would have them adopted with the purpose of raising them as their daughters. The lack of knowledge of other people’s cultures or the attribution of Western Culture onto other cultures through the lens of Western culture is glaringly egoistic as well as ignorant.”
Part 3, Her Children.
In this video we will take a look at some of various views on questions around the children and whether or not they are hers or if she adopted them. The argument that her children “do not look” like her is discussed in this video as well.
This video is Part 3 of a series of videos that discuss this very interesting and controversial topic, “Is Michelle Obama a Transgendered Woman?”
“This is a personal pet peeve of mine as I hear so much about the so-called Gay Agenda and how folks equate that to genocide. They forget the “overpopulation” agenda where families were encouraged to have fewer children before the planet exploded.
I guess being 65 years old gives me the advantage of living thru history and not just being told what historically happened. I was there, and I remember.
Now, as far as their children is concerned, the problem with this is that some say they were adopted in Morocco, some say Ethiopia and others just speculate, not sighting where they were adopted.
Others say the children don’t even look like them. My response to that is incredulous. How often do we have children that don’t look like us but look like our brother, sister, aunt or cousin? The way a person looks does not in many cases tell you who their parents are. You can morph a face on top of another face for days and days, it still proves nothing!
Sometimes a child may look like a dead relative that folks haven’t seen in ages and can’t even recall what they looked like when they were alive, then you find an old dusty picture and sure enough. As a birth coach I have seen little ones come out looking like so many other folks it ain’t funny. What does that prove?”
Part 4, the First Lady, Style and Physique.
This video is Part 4 of a series of videos that discuss this very interesting and controversial topic, “Is Michelle Obama a Transgendered Woman?” In this video we will take a look at some of various views on questions around Michelle Obama, her style and physique. We will look at the change/make over before and after. We will discuss the fact that she has muscles now!!!! Because she’s been working out.
“Before Michelle got to the White House, in observing her early pictures, she did not have the definition she has now. She’s been working out, therefore her physique is more toned and she clearly has develop her muscles. It is as if folks are saying she was a man first, became a woman and you can tell because of her muscles. LOL, if she wanted to be a woman then why would she build up her physique to resemble a man in the first place, wouldn’t she be taken hormones to keep the testosterone levels down, not work out to build them up. It is commonly known that the more you work out, the more testosterone the body will secrete to accommodate the increase in muscle development. Wouldn’t that be defeating the purpose of being a girl? Wouldn’t it make more sense for her to stay away from the gym than to go to the gym and let everyone see that she is really a dude?”
Part 5, African Women.
This video is Part 5 of a series of videos that discuss this very interesting and controversial topic, “Is Michelle Obama a Transgendered Woman?”
In this video we will take a look at some pictures of African Women from around the globe. African Women come in so many shapes and sizes it’s hard to singularly point to a standard shape they come in. I have posted pictures of African Woman for your review and for your increased knowledge. Comparing African Women body types to European Body types is not science. It does not use discretion, evidence, experience or knowledge of the African Woman’s anatomy, but it uses a European Standard to compare. This is very disingenuous for anyone who has not done any research speaks with authority about Michelle Obama’s physique.
Part 6, Michelle the Tranny
This video is Part 6 of a series of videos that discuss this very interesting and controversial topic, “Is Michelle Obama a Transgendered Woman?”
In this video we will take a look at the Homosexual/Transgender Phenomenon, its place in the African American Culture, lifestyle and community, particularly during the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. We will explore the nature of the social reality during the time when Michelle Obama was born and how probable her family would venture out to change their male child into a girl child.
We will also look at the discrepancies in the reports that say she “changed” during childhood while others say “she changed” in college. Her childhood, high school and college pictures should be enough evidence, but alas.. They still want to believe, Michelle Obama is a tranny.
Part 7, Is She a Transsexual?
In this video I cover the definition of “transsexual”, the history LGBT movement, and the black community.
I am getting beat up for even broaching this topic, but as an Educator and having lived on this planet as a Black Woman in America for 65+ years I feel I need to speak on the erroneous and illogical things going around on this topic for the sake of clarity.
Transsexual Defined
From Wikipedia.
Now, please don’t think that I am that naive that I trust everything that I find in Wikipedia, but let’s just say we are using their definition for the sake of expediency.
I really prefer to look at this thing in the most logical and sensible way possible so let’s see what we can glean from this short definition from wikipedia.
“Transsexual people experience a gender identity that is inconsistent with, or not culturally associated with, their assigned sex,”
As we have seen, Michelle Obama was born a female, so this would mean that, rather than her currently being a man, it would mean she was a girl that wanted to or felt the so called gender dysphoria as a young “girl” hence, she would be a “man” now instead of a man pretending to be a woman. It would stand to reason however, if she were born a man, than she would be considered transsexual.
“and desire to permanently transition to the gender with which they identify, usually seeking medical assistance (including hormone replacement therapy and other sex reassignment therapies) to help them align their body with their identified sex or gender.”
So, here we see that the use of hormones would be necessary in order for the transition from male to female to take place.
Again, since we can clearly see that Michelle was a girl at birth, then if she was uncomfortable being a girl, she would now be a man, having taken the hormone therapy needed to change into a man. But we clearly see she is carrying herself like a woman. This is confusing.
Part 8, is She Transgender?
In this video I cover the definition of “transgender”, the history LGBT movement, and the black community.
I am getting beat up for even broaching this topic, but as an Educator and having lived on this planet as a Black Woman in America for 65+ years I feel I need to speak on the erroneous and illogical things going around on this topic for the sake of clarity.
Transgender Defined
How many folks out there who are claiming that Michelle is Michael, knows anyone who is transgender or transsexual? How many of you have watched the transformation, physically, mentally or spiritually? How many of you out there know what a transgender person would have to go through in order to get pass the rigors of the physical and psychological challenges placed upon them to make this change? How many of you are aware of how much it costs?
Part 9, Where it All Began.
Going down the rabbit hole, we find the original article that started this rumor. ““Let’s write stuff to expose how stupid people are.”” Mr. Butvidas, editor of Christwire.org
Throughout this series, I will be sighting videos, articles and comments that I have researched on the Internet that related to this topic. The details, narration and links will be hosted in my blog post listed in the link below.
Along with many YouTube videos on this topic, I wish to add my perspective.
Doing a little more research on this “is Michelle Obama A Man” I actually tracked down the original news outlet that hosted this article. Of course the article is no longer in their archive and they ask for prayers:
“The Holy Archives – (Please Pray As Out Web-engineers Work To Restore The Archives Destroyed By Obama)”
Initially I was searching for the article referenced as being printed June 30, 2011, by Matthew B. Glosser, entitled “Shocking New Revelation About Michelle Obama, A must Read Christwire Exclusive.” Apparently Mr. Glosser is or was a writer for ChristWire in 2011.
The article was reprinted by Dr. Eowyn on another website called Fellowship of the Minds.
However, upon further research I came across this article By Adam Pasic, entitled, “The Guys Behind Christwire, Creating Parody From ‘Glenn Beck on Steroids” This site was mentioned in a 2010 article by the New York Times as being a satirical site.
Christwire.org has had its story lifted, in total and spread around the Internet on several “right wing websites” and is the most often quoted proof that this story about Michelle Being a Man, is True.
“Shocking New Revelation about Michelle Obama: A Must Read, Christwire Exclusive” By Matthew B. Glosser JUNE 30, 2011
NB Commentary: From the introduction through to where it all began, I have attempted to shed some light on this subject by giving a historical framework of how the Black community 50 years ago would have dealt with homosexuality and the transgender phenomenon. I hope that the information I have revealed will suggest to people who believe this meme, that quite possibly they have been hoodwinked and that from here on out they will be more circumspect in coming to conclusions about things or at least will take the time to research the source of the information so as to avoid being “Hoodwinked” as the writer of this story along with many other writers, reporters and journalist from various news outlets have done since the beginning of the concept of “telling a story” or “spreading the news.” I want to sum it up with a few more statements, beginning with the difference between transsexual and transgender phenomenon and end this series with my concluding remarks.
Greetings, Peace & Blessings To You, Your Family & Loved Ones,
My name is Nana Baakan and I am making this Blog Post to make an announcement.
I have recently been suspended from Google+. So to all of my contacts out there who are responding to my posts and even my videos, if I don’t get back to you it is because I am now unable to respond to any posts. I am using Facebook, Instagram, GAB, Twitter and my Blog to share information and things like that, but as far as Google+ is concerned, you may find my absence a bit conspicuous and this is why.
They suspended me!
Now, I am not sure what part of the long list of rules that I may have broken, was it one or 20 because they do not tell you “why” they suspended you but that you are suspended.
These turkeys give you these toys to play with, but they hold the reigns when, where, and how you play with them. If you don’t like it, close the account they say, but make sure you save all of your data. Meanwhile they got the goods on you anyways and they don’t care if you come or go, really.
Unfortunately, those of us who depend on these toys for our livelihood are struck down into a panic, when we see the dreaded red line going across the top of your profile. I have read and read the suspension notice. Does it make any sense? No? Is it clear about what terms of service I violated? NO!
Is it threatening? Yes, Yes and yes.
Google is weird, it wants you to be in these groups, yet you better not post the
same thing in them in a 2hour span of time or else “out you go”. And you never know which group reported you. Some secret hater who doesn’t want you to have an friends on Google or make any traction on Google, or works for Google and is trolling to get folks to shut down accounts, how many can they do in a month? Well, maybe not, I am probably exaggerating but it sure feels like somebody is specifically targeting you when this happens, this is my second time, First time, I was able to find out who it was thru my own research, this time, I said whatever, I’ll just make a video and tell on them, now!!
Interesting twist on this rumor of Michelle being born a man. Blurring of gender lines is an interesting topic that I want to tackle in my own video. But suffice it to say, there is still a level of naiveté’ on your part as it relates to body types, and what’s feminine and what’s masculine. I can see your point about branding, but, I am not too sure if I agree with it to the extent that you are portraying in this video.
There’s a much deeper issue going on when it comes to a so-called masculine looking black woman and a so-called feminine looking black male. You really cannot speak on the body types unless you are an African or of African descent and someone who has traveled the continent or at least took the time to study the bodies that you find there.
Another thing I would like to mention is that the idea of beefing up the body was started back in the 80’s long before Michelle or Obama came into the white house. Just look around at all the work-out studios you find in the Western world. Mostly because Westerners live sedentary lives, they don’t farm, they don’t walk, they don’t pick berries, they don’t do hard work, so a work-out studio or gym is a good place for them to burn off calories as the Western diet is causing such obesity.
Another thing I want to point out is that everybody who works out, will not necessarily gain that muscle tone, so I do agree they are probably using enhancers; Michelle did not have that muscle tone, pre-WhiteHouse. However, Obama, has always been lean and some what feminine. I doubt if he looked like Mike Tyson if he would have gotten elected.
Again, you are missing the subtle reality that black men face here in America. They are threatening, remember what the police officer said about Mike Brown?
Also, my granddaughter was born with muscle tone, she never ever worked out before she was born except to kick the bajessus out of her mom inutero. Some men never gain muscle tone, without enhancers, and even in those cases, they never reach the “Arnold” without steroids and endangering their health as well.
Masculinity and femininity seem to be gleaned through a lens that is socially unique to you and how you see the world. There are many other cultures around the world where the line is very slight and other cultures where the celebration of the feminine is done by the men dressing up and celebration of the masculine where the women dress up.
The lines are not blurred, everyone knows they have both inside of them. They also are secure in their roles in the society… so a feminine man still functions as a man in his society and a more masculine woman still functions as a woman.
You seem to be looking at the body and the form it is in rather than the actions of the persons in the body and the roles they play.
There are men who are quite comfortable staying at home and taking care of the household and women who would rather work. All that means is one likes to be more domestic and the other more worldly.
What happens in Western culture too often is that it is either BLACK OR WHITE, but nature is not that way, not at all. I once had a male cat assist the female cat during her labor.
It is all about energy. I would say that there is certainly a distortion as it is presented particularly in Western culture and maybe because Western culture tends to see things as either black or white, right or wrong, they are having a hard time with the blending, but in other cultures, it’s all about energy.
Their belief systems are different, the way they look through their lens at the world is different and the roles of male and female are different.
If, Western culture is in crisis due to the blurring of the gender lines, than that to me speaks more to the world view of those in the western culture, their values and precepts, but they are not applicable to the entire world.
There is a far more sinister agenda to the beefing up of the masses in this culture, but I will not go into that on this thread… but thanks for your video, it was certainly food for thought.
LINKS:
President Obama, in 2004 with wife Michelle and daughter Sasha
This week, TIME Magazine placed Cox on its cover, making her the first transgender woman to accomplish this feat, and published a riveting interview with her on race, gender and bullying. Here are the highlights from Cox’s interview and below, a behind the scenes video of Cox as she prepares for her historic cover.
One of the reasons we have Black run ones such as the Miss Black Universe, Duval and the other Black transgender pageant systems is because the negative African-American beauty perceptions that were espoused by this person are sadly part of the dominant culture. The end result is a perception in our GLBT subset of it that results in Black transwomen not getting fair shakes in judging when they compete in predominately white GLBT pageants.
Halperin said another reason Jenner may reconsider her transition is that the reality star still has an attraction to women “and wants to meet the right one.”
NB Commentary: Sharing this article from Atlanta Black Star. A must read speaks to the disparity between the needs that vary between White and Black Feminism movements.
Just one day after the inauguration of President Donald Trump, an estimated 470,000 people (and millions more across the United States and the world) flooded the streets of Washington, D.C., for the first Women’s March on Washington.
Men, women and children — but mostly women — turned out for the historic march on Saturday, Jan. 21, to stand up for women’s rights but also to protest against newly inaugurated President Donald Trump, who made a series of overtly misogynistic remarks during his campaign.
Millions ultimately gathered to unify under the umbrella of feminism, civil rights, immigration and environmental activism, among other issues. However, many Black female organizers and intellectuals had their doubts about the march meeting the needs and concerns of Black women.
Old rifts between Black women organizers and the white feminist movement began to arise soon after the idea for the Women’s March on Washington was announced. The New Yorker reported that the idea for the march was credited to Teresa Shook, a retired white lawyer who resides in Hawaii. After Trump’s surprising presidential win, Shook launched a Facebook event page suggesting a protest. Word of her anti-Trump idea quickly spread, garnering more than 10,000 supporters overnight.
Shook initially called her event the Million Woman March, a moniker originally attributed to a massive protest for Black sisterhood and self-determination held in Philadelphia in 1997. The retired attorney eventually changed the name of her rally, but some Black women still weren’t convinced and accused white women’s rights advocates of appropriating movements started by Black women.
MWM 10-25-1997 Philadelphia, PA“The many mistakes inherent at all levels of organizing the Women’s March event from very early on demonstrate the very problematic nature of ‘white feminism,’ ” Jalessah Jackson, a Gender and Cultural Studies major working on her master’s at Simmons College in Boston told Atlanta Black Star. “That is, white feminists’ tendency [historically] to align themselves with white supremacy to achieve their own goals.” “What we see happening is white women tokenizing and using women of color to advance their own agenda,” Jackson continued. “I don’t think that’s genuinely intersectional. I’m not interested in faux solidarity or intersectionality being merely an afterthought.”
The “intersectionality” Jackson spoke of is a term coined by African-American feminist and legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and is the concept of inextricably linked facets of race, sex, gender identity and economic status.
The galvanizing issue behind the march was the election of President Trump, who walked to victory with 53 percent of the white female vote. But could white women who couldn’t convince other white women to vote against Trump now center themselves in the “resistance” against his policies?
Many African-American women questioned why they should respond to white women’s call for human rights when they felt their own calls had gone unanswered. Historically, African-American women’s rights advocates have taken issue with the feminist movement overall, highlighting its sometimes racist and exclusionary practices. Was this present-day equality march tumbling down the same rabbit hole? Was it catering to the anxiety of white women over Trump’s victory, while bypassing the real concerns Black women (and communities) have been organizing around for centuries without the resources or support from the people now jumping in front of the line?
Lastly, if Hillary Clinton had won the election and broken the glass ceiling, would there still not be a need for a march to make sure Clinton was clued in that women, particularly Black women, would still be facing income and wealth gabs, police and incarceration issues, terrible public education policies, as well as reproductive rights issues?
Columnist Jamilah Lemieux addressed these concerns in an op-ed piece for ColorLineson Tuesday, Jan. 17. In it, Lemieux explained that she wouldn’t be participating in the Women’s March because she didn’t see the point in “putting my body on the line to feign solidarity with women who, by and large, didn’t have my back prior to November.”
“When I learned that some of those women had decided to channel their disappointment into a ‘Million Women March,’ my twisted moment of pleasure quickly gave way to a familiar sense of annoyance,” she wrote. “Once again, the labors of Black folks (in this case, the 1995 Million Man March and the 1997 Million Woman March organized by Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam) were being co-opted and erased by clueless White ones.
Correction: The Million Women’s March grassroots approach to organizing involved Black women sharing information through groups such as Alpha Kappa Alpha, Black media and word of mouth. Organized by Phile Chionesu and Asia Coney, that march focused on the idea of Black women supporting each other. Speakers had included Jada Pinkett Smith, Sistah Souljah and the daughters of Malcolm X. Assata Shakur also read a message from Cuba. People marching held signs that read “I am one in a million,” and “Black Women: No more AIDS, abuse, addiction,” according to CNN. http://www.phillytrib.com/news/local-women-to-rally-for-women-s-march-in-d/article_850a3906-51da-53cc-84de-93fed0a4587e.html
“Will the Women’s March on Washington be a space filled primarily with participants who believe that Black lives matter?” Lemieux added. “I’m not sure.”
Black women’s rights advocates like Lemieux and others who spoke out against the march’s lack of intersectionality and called for more inclusivity were quickly deemed “divisive” and destructive to the vision of feminist solidarity. White feminists condemned African-American, LGBTQ, and Muslim activists who dared to speak up when their interests were forgotten or ignored, creating what critics called “conflict.”
“The attempted hijacking of the march’s agenda and all the nasty tit-for-tat between white vs. black/queer/Muslim/trans and other identities tells a very disturbing story about the divided state of feminism today,” contributor Emma-Kate Symons wrote in an opinion piece for Women in the World. “It saddens me to see the inclusive liberal feminism I grew up with reduced to a grab bag of competing victimhood narratives and individualist identities jostling for most oppressed status.”
Jackson countered Symons’ argument, however, by pointing out how white feminists who supposedly care about the rights of ALL women failed to rally behind Black female victims of police brutality. She added that white women’s rights advocates have a tendency to pick and choose whose female rights they care about.
“Most of the women who marched pat themselves on the back and go back to ignoring women who reside at the intersections of multiple identities,” Jackson told ABS. “Identifying these issues is not being divisive. I believe that in order to affect social change, we must identify what hasn’t been working in order to fix it.”
Some of these issues were resolved or at least finagled by including experienced nonwhite women organizers and activists in the writing of the guiding vision of the march, including them in the list of speakers and having them help lead the organizing process after the rocky start.
The Women’s March was a historic success in bringing out the masses, with far more people turning out for the protest than for Trump’s inauguration, according to The New York Times. But as the feminist movement struggles to become more diverse and open, many concerns need to be addressed, such as leadership, resources and the next steps in creating a viable “resistance” to Trump’s agenda. Moreover, there’s a need to tackle the liberalism of the historic feminist movement, which has too often fought for a place for white women at the expense of Black ones.
NB Commentary: By permission I am reposting a message sent to me via email. I found Mr. Chism’s thoughts compelling and worthy of posting in my blog. Feel free to leave your comments below. Thanks you.
The Counter Coup…. By Ronald Chism
2017-01-24
Peace,
(I have made fairly significant progress on my book, Nine Keys to Superior Living, so I decided to take a little break and share my perspective on what has just occurred in the U.S. Consider this a “post-election” analysis, although the impact of this election reaches far, far beyond the borders of the United States.)
Some 15 years ago, I told my wife that she and I would live to see a coup–perhaps a military coup–in the United States that would be a counter-coup against the forces that engineered the 1961 coup that was initiated by the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a coup and assassination that I, at age 11, “witnessed,” at least on television, as well as a counter-coup against the neo-conservative forces that initiated 9/11.
Yes, there have been two coup d’etats in the U.S., in modern times, and one counter-coup:
The coup that occurred at the assassination of JFK
The coup that occurred on 9/11.
The counter-coup initiated by forces that picked Donald Trump to be the visible representative of that coup.
Now, Trump did not organize it himself, nor did he conceive of it. He was picked by the major counter-coup organizers because of his unique status as a global businessman and, essentially, his status as a civil nationalist [He’s not a Republican, and merely ran on the Republican ticket because he would have had no chance to win had he ran as an independent. Running as a Republican was a mere tool]. I will name the major organizers of the coup in this brief note.
First, a brief note. There are two, cultural views within the United States, neither one of which touched upon the primereality that has been happening in the U.S. and on the planet. Those two cultural views are:
Leftist views that are limited to social issues, such as racism (anti-racism), feminism, the gay agenda, equal rights (including for the handicapped), etc.
Rightest views that center on right-to-life issues (anti-abortion), religion (e.g., prayer in school, the promulgation of “Christian values,” etc.), anti-immigration, etc.
But prime issue that has defined the trajectory of U.S. policy both in the U.S. and abroad has been the struggle between freedom and slavery; between ‘higher’ caste and ‘lower’ caste’ between a tiny controlling cabal, and the rest of us. Although this type of struggle has been happening for thousands of years, it has manifested itself in a unique, and infinitely more dangerous manner in the modern age than in the past.
And this was explained clearly, as a warning, by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his famous Farewell Address. The unique manner in which this struggle has manifested itself in the modern age is through what Eisenhower defined as The Military-Industrial Complex, which quickly became the tool by which global dominance [New World Order] would be achieved by a hidden elite (generally hidden from the common people.) If you have not viewed his Farewell Address, you can do so by clicking here. Here is a short quote from that address:
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
Here are the major players that engineered the counter-coup that installed Trump into the Presidency as the visible representative of that coup (You will not find these people on The Internet, listed as part of a counter-coup. I deduced this list through observation):
A group within the Deep State that feared the impending social destruction of the United States by the forces that were trying to create the NWO. The Deep State was never of one mind. There were always divisions. But it was 9/11, and the horrid results of 9/11 (both domestically and internationally) that swelled the ranks of those within the Deep State that became opposed to the methods of the others within the deep state whom they perceived as destructive to world and national order and peace. The CIA, an arm of the Deep State, was also split, one force wishing to carry on the plans for NWO, the other force wishing to depart from those plans.
Dr. Steve Piezcienik
Roger Stone
Gerald Celente
Alex Jones (believe it or not ) And I’m not kidding.
General James Mattis
General John Kelly
General Michael Flynn
Dr. Steven Greer
Aware, anti-globalist, citizen-dot-connectors of the United States who, using The Internet, exercised a significant portion of the U.S. to the possibility that Trump was an anti-globalist.
Julian Assange
What we have witnessed is a Civil War, which is still happening at this moment that has taken place chiefly in the shadows and on The Internet. And it has not been a bloodless Civil War, unfortunately, because people have been killed. But it is a relatively bloodless coup, waged mostly through The Internet, but also through the hard work of the above people and their assistants, some of whom do not live in the United States.
[Oh, incidentally, I have no special knowledge about this. No one has shown me “the secret files.” My claims are based on what I now perceive as the very obvious disclosure that a counter-coup has occurred, that disclosure appearing before our very eyes, in both the mainstream and alternative media, every single day now. Some of this I pieced together on my own, some of it is information that I gathered from the analysis of others, including experts. Only one individual, a serious expert in intelligence, Dr. Steve Piezcienik, has actually stated that a counter-coup has occurred].
Now, all of the “right/left” commotion, in the streets, in the form of marches and counter-marches that you are witnessing has ZERO–nada–to do with what is reallygoing on before our eyes. Trump, in order to get votes, held the mirror up before a significant number of disaffected U.S. citizens, and simply reflected, from that mirror, onto himself, what they wanted to hear.In short, he out-politicked the politicians. I doubt very seriously if Trump is a committed racist (Mexican, African, or otherwise), misogynist, or that he hates the religion of Islam. Roger Stone was his principal guide who fully understood the various factions in the U.S. that Trump would have to appeal to:
Regarding the last mentioned item, anti-DC politicians, remember: 40% of eligible voters did not vote. This is a measure of the massive discontent, amongst the citizenry. Trump’s handlers were excellent in mapping out a strategy for Trump, as well as appropriate messaging.
When I say “appropriate” messaging, I’m not talking about morality. I’m talking about messaging that was appropriate for appealing to the above-listed audience.
I’ll wrap this up now. Does this mean that I believe Trump to be the real deal? In a word, yes. And I won’t mind if I end up being wrong. No problem.
But understand what I’m saying that he’s the real deal about. He’s the real deal in being the visible head of that side of this current Civil War (occurring in the shadows, on The Internet, and now, actually, partially in public) that is attempting to destroy the machinations of Deep State globalists, who are also called the proponents of a New World Order.
(Before continuing, please understand the following: I will not argue or debatethis matter with anyone. That is a promise. Say, or believe, whatever you wish. I have analyzed the situation, and it is crystal clear to me what is going on. I was correctlyable to discover, on my own, what was happening inside Libya in 2011. And I was proven correct. I wrote 200 articles for Mathaba.net, using a pseudonym, alerting people about what was happening in Libya. Others did also, and that was because, in part, they were studying as hard as I was and we all, 32 of us, came up with the same correctconclusions.
(Trump might not do all that he claims he’s going to do. But there is a priority now. And that priority he is addressing: Destroy the influence of the destructive Deep State, which artificially started a perpetual “war on terrorism” to exact money from ordinary citizens, through taxes, so that arms manufacturers, oil merchants (thieves), corporations, and others could fatten their bank accounts. I believe that Trump is sincerely trying to put this to an end.)
What shocked me (in a positive way) was Trump’s inaugural speech. I was absolutely, 100% certain that he would give a speech that was totally almost the opposite of his campaign rhetoric. I assumed that he would “kick in” and bow down to the political status quo (composed of Democrats and Republicans) and deliver what his opponents would happily call a “conciliatory speech.” He did not!!
I was laughing my ASS off, because he stated the same things that he had stated during the campaign, which is totally not what politicians do. They lie during the campaign, to get votes, and then, at the inauguration, they turn back and give the signal, to the political establishment, that, “Okay, guys, I’m ready to play ball.” He didn’t do that. I was shocked.
Instead, he again lambasted all of the establishment, including the political establishment, and put his reputation on the line by saying that, Here is where it ends, meaning business as usual. I’m paraphrasing, but you can listen to his speech here, if you have not done so. He openly talked, at the inauguration, about how the politicians had enriched themselves, but left Americans impoverished. I do not remember, in my lifetime, any in-coming President saying such things at an inauguration.
We, as ordinary human beings, particularly those of us that are citizens of the United States, have rightly grown almost totally cynical about the power-elite. They are expert liars; expert promisers; expert do-nothings; expert exploiters; expert enslavers. So, it is no surprise that we cannot get ourselves to believe, not to even mention trust, any politicians.
I was suspicious of that guy all the way up to the inauguration. I had hoped that he might be a true outsider, and a truly concerned person, that would go up against the Deep State. But, I could not get myself to believe it. But when he spoke at the inauguration, I thought, “This guy is the real deal!”
I wonder his chances of staying alive for four years? Since the inauguration, his moves have been directly against the Deep State, and obviously so. You can research that in your own way. It’s virtually out into the public domain now, on The Internet.
He dumped TPP. He announced the re-negotiation of NAFTA. He gave hints of working with Russia, in Syria, to destroy ISIS, although, characteristically, he’s not going to openly show his hand (as he had stated during the campaign).
And the hysteria against him is coming from all over the place. When all elements of the establishment–the media, the upper echelon of the intelligence agencies, both political parties, the Executive Branch–go up against someone, then that person is obviously perceived by them to be an immense threat.
At the first White House Press Briefing, his press secretary, Trump’s White House Secretary, Sean Spicer, laid out some dynamic plans that clearly indicated a huge break from Deep State culture. One such break was the announcement that Trump was setting up Skype Seats, which will be for journalist in other parts of the country that do not have the clout and “inside” power as DC journalists have, and that the mainstream media used to have. This is an absolutely clear and direct swipe at one of the main control mechanisms of the Deep State: The mainstream press.
This is an attempt to defang the mainstream press, although that job has been powerfully taken on by the alternative media also, and also to democratize it, for lack of a better word–to give remote news organs the opportunity to compete, in their localities, with the mainstream media (which is now being called, the legacy media, or the lame-stream media).
I urge people again: Work on the metaphysics. Because, the Deep State actors are not going to give up. What we have to hope is that they do not conduct deadly false flag operations designed to force the new President to respond. Or we have to hope that if such operations are being planned, that they be thwarted mystically by the metaphysical efforts of those of us that believe in such efforts, and also by whatever physical efforts can be made.
Remember: All over the planet, even in Africa(east Africa, specifically) there are groups amongst the citizenry that are now fighting against the Deep State. As Dr. Steve Greer has often explained: The Deep State is a trans-national entity, not an entity confined to the United States.
Last, remember: There are priorities. The biggest priority is to destroy the influence of the Deep State, and, eventually, to destroy the Deep State period. I believe that this coup has happened directly for those purposes.
That’s the end of my analysis. It’s going to be interesting.
Wow, they are gonna get their divide and conquer by any means necessary.
Don’t like it, protest it!
Don’t like somebody else’s leader ruling over you?
Protest it.
Somebody else’s leader can go to hell in a hand basket. F ’em. Not my President!
I can hear the chanting.
Protest!
Drop tons of dollars into the coffers of this corrupt system!Protest more and more, buy sharpies and card board and bus tickets and hotel rooms and show that Billionaire you can pay other billionaires you favor, to continue to rule over you.
Your rulers are better than their rulers. Cause your ruler eats Kennel Ration.
Kick him out of office, disgrace him. Show him how much you hate him. Show him how deplorable he is.
Protest, protest and protest some more.
Show the new world order that you are willing sheep who won’t take responsibility for your actions but want the government to be responsible for your actions.
Show them you will be quite happy if they would dispose this maniacal demon AND replace him with….. um……who? Hillary? Forget her scandals, at least she loves women, and on a good day she might speak up for them.
Don’t show the NWO that you realize that you are being played and taken to the bank, because you keep supporting the system that is eating at your very being. You just want to have the right to choose your predator. Never mind that the other guy won, fair and square according to the election results.
Look, if you wanna play this game of STATISM, be a good order follower and chum up to your new leader. MAYBE he’ll be kind and never grab another pussy, ever. Maybe he won’t call fat women fat anymore or CNN, fake news and maybe, you could get him to DO something for women’s rights like stop being friends with the Saudis like his predecessors before him.
I don’t get it. If you don’t like the system the way it’s set up, then why did you vote in the first place?
It just looks like you don’t like the system when it’s not in your favor.
Why protest, when you could shut it down by not spending a single dime for 3 days.
How the FL Shooting Will Be Used To Bolster War, Usurp Freedom, And Create More Terrorism
by Claire Bernish
After September 11, 2001, discarding freedom and personal liberties in the name of security became standard operating procedure following a tragedy, and Friday’s mass shooting at the airport in Fort Lauderdale has not deviated from the new Orwellian norm.
Officials say Esteban Santiago arrived in Florida on a flight from Alaska and proceeded to the baggage claim area, where he pulled a firearm from his checked bag and opened fire — killing five people and wounding eight.
“He eventually retrieved a firearm and began indiscriminately shooting,” Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel told the press Friday. “This cowardly, heinous act resulted in the deaths of five people.”
While the incident unfolded, before total casualties and injuries had been counted, corporate media presstitutes championed in live time increased security measures and tighter strictures on gun laws — except for TSA agents, whom, some intoned, should now be required to carry firearms in the performance of their duties.
We have been conditioned for this. Fustian politicians assume an inept undervaluation of rights — and a careless lack of vigilance under color of fear — in the minds of the somnambulant masses will allow the implementation of new rights-crushing legislation.
On cue, the Wall Street Journal nearly immediately published an article citing Jeff Price, an aviation security expert and aviation-management professor at Metropolitan State University of Denver, who — without a hint of irony — asserted,
I think we can expect to see more of what we’ve seen every time we have one of these incidents at an airport — better-armed, better-trained police and a surge in law-enforcement visibility.
Because terrorism. Because mass shootings. Most simply, because guns.
Guns, many pols and gun-control enthusiasts will tell you, create calamity — nothing else — and the Second Amendment is an antiquated anomaly to be relegated to the already overflowing dustbin of constitutional rights.
These politicians will further exploit fear of The Next Tragedy to install new checkpoints, more scanners, appended means to verify identity, and additional TSA agents — already proven wholly ineffective, if not derelict — to molest, grope, and harass anyone daring to enter an airport.
Travel, they’ll say, is a dangerous affair — and must be policed accordingly.
No matter Santiago has been deemed mentally disturbed — one person, a lone shooter, who chose a divergent method for enmity — now that someone has undertaken a mass shooting in this manner, terrorists paid attention and gleaned fresh plans, they’ll say.
This snark is in no way reductive to the abhorrent nature of the indiscriminate shooting, nor to the mourning which indeed the country must now collectively experience; but right now is precisely the time for acute attentiveness — not fear-induced myopia as has become epidemic after such incidents.
A more rational response surprisingly came from one legislator, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Greg Steube, who is sponsoring a bill to eliminate gun-free zones in Florida — a necessary measure now that the state has experienced three horrific mass shootings.
“My first thoughts and prayers are with the families of the victims,” Steube said Friday, quoted byUSA Today. “But this goes back to the fact why I’ve been working against gun-free zones for the past three years.
Gun-free zones don’t prevent criminals from breaking the law and killing innocent victims. All that law did was prevent law-abiding citizens who have a concealed-carry permit from carrying their firearm in defense of themselves and others.
Stricture and prohibition spark black markets — if someone intends to do harm using a firearm, they will find it. That applies equally to all mass shooters — whether mentally unstable, paranoid xenophobe, or religious radical — if guns are the intended tool for an attack, oppressive gun laws only stop law-abiding civilians from killing whatever malicious wingnut next begins shooting random people in a crowd.
Tightening the reins on suffocating security procedures and positioning additional law enforcement officers in airports also won’t stop criminals of any motivation from discerning a creative method to thwart remaining deficiencies. These repeated clamp-downs only restrict our ability to travel freely — they aren’t preventing the next attack or quashing terrorism as politicians claim.
Fear is a potent manipulator — and the government counts on pulling the blindfold of dread over everyone’s eyes in the wake of catastrophe to erase yet another protected freedom from the Bill of Rights.
This time, don’t let it happen — don’t be fooled into obliging lawmakers whose only motive is to use death as a Police State weapon against all of us.
There is no excuse for violence against another for any reason, and should not be condoned by anyone. this whole 4 thugs torture a poor defenseless mentally challenged child” narrative is skewed. I read a lot of comments under the videos presented and news stories written about this event. It seems that folks can hardly wait to spew venom at the supposed perpetrators of a crime against someone they deem innocent, harmless and defenseless.
And then I remember. The innocents who were kidnapped, tortured, beaten, starved and stuffed in the hulls of ships during the North Atlantic Slave trade. I remember the many who died and who still cry in the slave Castles of Elmina. I remember standing there and feeling the walls close in on me as their cries ripped my ears apart. I remember not being able to even read the entire book “Black cargoes.”
I remember Antoine Sterling, Trayvon Martin, Sandra Bland and many others who simply wanted to be able to be treated like human beings.
I remember the Palestinians, who face torture and trepidation every day as they watch home after home, community after community bulldozed to the ground and their guts squeeze in a vice grip, like a traffic jam.
I remember homeless veterans who fought for a cause not their own, but for a false system with the false belief that it is the protectorate of the world and the way to keep it safe from tyrannical leaders, is to drone democracy down its throat.
I remember the many traumatic false flags perpetrated by a thuggish system that only cares about the financial advantage of its escapades and not the hurt, trauma, guilt and deceit perpetrated on the masses who view this thuggishness.
I remember the many lost children, lost forever and barely recorded by the alphabet agencies, who thru their own complicity, cover up the many scandalous crimes perpetrated against the most vulnerable of our world, our children.
I remember how the churches, mosques and synagogues are filled with hate, deceit, anger, distrust, incest, rape and adultery, while their walls are painted in diamonds and gold.
I remember the buried bodies of aborted fetuses, silenced in the night by the desperation of ill-informed and frightened women, who see their bodies as property for someone else to use and discard of as they see fit.
I see, lost children, stuck in their devices, screaming and fainting when they don’t
get what they feel they deserve no matter how outlandish it may seem to their adult counterparts.
I remember men in dark cloaks, in dark rooms in the middle of the night, who plot and plan the annihilation of millions of people from the face of the planet by any means necessary.
I remember the destruction that is blasted through the media in movie after movie, video game after video game where oversized imaginations struggle to believe it ain’t real, when, all the credits say is, “no animal was hurt in this film.”
I remember the cognitive dissonance.
And then I remember the litany all over again, the pain, hurt, distress, agony, abuse, etc. that one human being can impose on another, but then, somehow, it has to do with race or nothing at all to do with race, or maybe a little bit to do with race, or maybe it’s just ugly people doing ugly things.
And then I remember how fascinated we as humans become, to watch and engage in the total destruction of another human.
Maybe some of it is poor judgment, some of it nervousness, some of it voyeurism and some of it just incredulous, but all of it is us.
Every last one of us. All of it is in us.
And each of us, have the potential to be mean, cruel and despicable as the person we happen to be recently pointing our fingers at.
Cause I remember those cries for blood for the murderer. The lust and pleasure and joy in the eye when the verdict came down, “Execution” and the crowds that gather around to “watch” the “murdering thug” take his last breath. I remember the pleas for clemency from that murdering thug both behind bars and free .
I remember how quickly we are able to commit acts of violence, spanning a wide spectrum, against another human being and blame them for just being there, in the way.
So, yeah, those 4 young people, who lost their minds, lost their sensibilities, lost their empathy for another helpless defenseless one, were being insensitive thugs, they were committing a crime, and Facebook was complicit in this criminal act for allowing it to be aired and participating in the agenda of divide and conquer.
And yes, there is justice, and yes, there is truth, but in this reality, were we are all complicit, were we are all capable, so. Let us all remember, but for the Grace of God, go I.
Four Chicago Suspects Charged With Hate Crime After Broadcasting Torture of Special Needs Teen on Facebook Live
NB Commentary: If it’s so fake, and so unbelievable, then why don’t they simply ignore it?
Why do so many so called “real news” outlets feel the need to spend so much time lambasting so called fake news.
They have relegated themselves to the likes of Snopes.com in an effort to cover up PizzaGate scandal. They have reported the debunked aspects of this story while ignoring the real indications and the real connections.
They are also telling out right lies, which is nothing new..
I find it ironic that they, in the past, have used Twitter accounts of what is happening in the world of news and posted it on their websites and TV programs, but now that the dark cover has been pulled back they want to discredit alternative news outlets.
When they go thru this much lambasting of alternative news, they must really be trying to hide something.
Sounds like they are in full attack mood.
They are panicking and shooting themselves in the foot the entire time.
Get a grip you guys.
Get off your Satanic Panic button.
Let it rest. We know what you all do in the dark. You can’t cover it up no more.
Now we just need witnesses, victims to come forward and shut it down. Hopefully, anyways.
What gets me is that “they” know their news is scripted. They read a teleprompter that pipes in the same spin. They get a chance to add a little caveat to it, an inflection or intonation, but they know that if they steer away from the script they will lose their jobs. They know the CIA is playing a huge roll in the news they pipe out and that government officials are typically present at the big news outlets. They have heard the horror stories and they have their own as it relates to how they are pruned to even be an announcer.
ABC anchor man said, “Breaking News, we now have news about Hillary Clinton’s death.” but she wasn’t dead. Fake news. They know that the poison gas debacle blamed on Syria’s Assad, was faked but they report what they are told. And how about the faked beheadings? They know that they even have to change their story and some folks get fired when they are exposed as faking a story, or in other instances get promoted if they can keep it going, i.e, Anderson Cooper and the Green Screen debacle during his interviewing of a Sandy Hook Grieving Mom. He lost his nose in that one.
Or how about the two news reporters claiming to be in two separate places but had the same truck drive by in the scene behind them. There are countless other examples, to many to even identify, yet they want to point a finger at the alternative news outlets and call them fake news.
They know this, yet they want to point fingers at independent news outlets and encourage a crack down on them. I say, look in the mirror first, and once that’s done, I am sure there will be few MSM outlets left if they were being honest.
They are so desperate. The funny thing is, by listing those so-called fake news outlets, they are actually giving you free advertisement, and that will get folks to check you out. Like Mommy and Daddy telling you don’t play with the children who live across the street. What are you going to do? Play with the children across the street. Maybe they need more publicity, if they talk begrudgingly about so-called fake news, they think they can get more viewers, but that’s too bad because they have lied so much, folks would rather find an alternative and they have given them a nice list to refer to. Who told them to do that?
When they claim that the alternative news stories that are not exactly true, or a spin or a mere fabrication, that those stories may cost someone’s lives, I can’t help but think of how the story of 19 hijackers with box cutters, took over 3 planes, crashed into two buildings in NY and one at the Pentagon and how this story hyped the American people up to the point they were willing to hurt somebody. Folks enlisted in droves to go fight the enemy of “our freedoms” only to find out that the whole war on terror was based on a lie. A lie so well orchestrated that to this day people still debate over whether it was an inside job. Forget whether it was inside or outside job, how about all the inconsistencies and how they spun the narrative.
9/11 is my pet peeve as it is so blatantly obvious to be bigger than any false flag preceding it. How many people died in the ensuing wars because of this fabricated story? And this story was so full of holes, doctored and re-written with obvious cover-up after cover-up and those who covered it up, got promoted and/or were never brought to “heel”.
It’s not the lie that bothers me, it’s the insult to my intelligence that I find offensive.
Every time I hear that adage, “fake news” I can only think of the many, many false flags, and how they repeated the same narrative. Remember that shooting of a TV anchor in VA? That was sooooo phoney, yet they kept repeating it like it was real. I think they are robots. Remember the “white hot” love guy who was clearly not so hot.. It was so fake, it was comical. They also fake the weather reports. It’s like the pot calling the kettle black. But more seriously, it’s the other arm of gun control. Control the narrative, control how folks can defend themselves and it’s a done deal. I only laugh because the Internet was created by DARPA, the CIA infiltrated Facebook and YouTube. Soros cause all them color revolutions with Twitter. Its like they created a toy for themselves and never expected it to become their destruction. They are falling over themselves trying to recoup their losses. The postal service lost with email and now the MSM is losing because of Social Media. What a world, what a world.
Let Me Conclude With This Summary:
When you set up an educational system that creates parrots who memorize and retort what they have learned to earn a grade, then you will create a mass of sheeple who will accept and regurgitate whatever they are given, from what ever news outlet, be it Mainstream or Alternative. Neither animal is always correct and certainly they all have to spin to keep their audience engaged. Some spin to the tune of millions of dollars, others to the tune of millions of followers but all in all it’s about getting their version of the “word” out there for consumption by the masses.
Since the masses have not been taught creative thinking, critical thinking or even discernment, it is difficult for many of them to separate the wheat from the tares when it comes to what is really going on in our world, and since most of us were not at the scene of the crime, we have to take “somebody’s” word for it.
Additionally, since much of what is reported is reported for the intellectual prowess of the average 5th grader, the news is watered down and dumbed down and spruced up with cleavage, entertainment and sometimes fantasy.
Once again, their desire to control the masses and create non-thinking robots has given the so called “alternative news” outlets a group of people who, quiet as it’s kept, still are not thinking outside of the box. They will each find their niche or some outlet that speaks to their sentiments and preconceived notions just as they would with any other news outlet.
So what we have is a battle between the MSM and the Alternative News. What are they fighting for? Followers, subscribers, ads and revenue. On both sides of the aisle you will find “truth telling” but the same system that made the MSM and it’s cohorts has made the Alternative News. So even this battle is a Psyops and does not speak to the deeper issue, we have a dumbed down, gullible, practically illiterate group of fans who support their narrative. It’s all about politics and economics in the final analysis.
NB Commentary: +Now You See TV, I want to leave a message for your and your guests on this show. I have never listened to your radio show before, this was my first time and I listened to the whole 2+hours.
After listening to it, I found that my thoughts were running through my mind, a thousand miles an hour. I felt compelled to get this message to you in those moments, but I slept on it and upon awakening, they were still there.
Let me start by thanking you for all your efforts in trying to get the word out about what is going on behind the scenes that is hurting our children and youth and bringing a major distortion in morals and morale in our country and around the world. i appreciate that you all are aware that this is not new nor is it isolated to the United States. People need to know that while they are focusing on the Podesta emails and the Clinton foundation that it is only the tip of the iceberg.
Now, let me tell you about myself. I have a lot of talents and abilities and I am an independent entrepreneur who specializes in Mental Health and working with people who have been traumatized by various life situations. One of the things we look at around trauma and/or those suffering with PTSD is triggers. I am sure you are aware of the trigger that fireworks have on returning soldiers from war. I think one of you mentioned something about aromas and how they set you up.
One of the most traumatic things that can happen to a person is to be raped. When it comes to a child there are no words to describe the devastation it causes across the spectrum of emotions and reactions to everyday life. The abuse accumulates a host of triggers, land minds as it were, that can go off at any time. Behavior becomes unpredictable to a great extent and these children need to be in support services for most of their lives.
When this abuse is done ritualistically it is even more insidious as it leaks across the dimensions of the human mind and seeps into the humans spirit affecting the very soul of the individual. Studies have shown that experiences with less of an impact on the psyche affect the structure of the DNA. It is called imprinting. These young people have been imprinted with a hideous exposure to hideous behavior by adults who are supposed to protect them.
Here’s my point… if you folks really want to help these young people and even the perps, which is admirable, you have to be very selective of your terminology. To offer them a blood sacrifice or tell them that they can be cleansed by being washed in the Blood of Christ who was tortured, hung on a cross and killed, may sound logical to you, but, to the psyche it does not. If a child has been frightened by clowns, telling them later that a clown will save them will not ease their fear.
And you cannot take them to the Bible, except to cherry pic the verses that do not contain God’s wrath, the killing of men, women and children, the command to eat their own children or even the most often quoted test of Abraham where God asked him to sacrifice his first born to show his faith. Again, I am talking about triggers here, and all of these are triggers. If you are who you say you are, and you have been privy to these rituals in your past you know that the terminology is the same, only they trade God with Satan.. or as we know, they give “Satan” the same accolades they give to God in heaven.
Again, please try to follow me here and what I am saying, and if you never get this or never read it or don’t care, or whatever, maybe other commentors on this thread who really want to help and hear what I am saying.
If a child/person has been exposed to horrendous or violence or torture or rape
or a combination of all the above… and it was down ritualistically (or not for that matter) more than likely terror, trepidation, blood, agony etc.. were present. If you use terms like “the Blood of Christ” you are not helping them, you are not saving them, and in fact, you are showing them an example of a individual who could have saved himself but did not for a higher cause of saving others. These are the exact same terminology and psychology that is used along with many others in these rituals.
You guys have to search your heart of hearts, pay attention to what you are saying, get some understanding of the human psyche and find another way to reach out to these people. Most of them will not come anywhere near you and they may not know why. Those who do will be so distorted in their thinking that you will not be able to even trust them to be forthright or even willing to heal. Your terminology sounds like the perpetrator so they may come into your experience to see if they can continue with you, as a mentor and then eventually creating the dynamic where abuse can take place in the relationship if only that you are not there to take care of them or “save” them when you promised but couldn’t do it because you were busy.
I really hope that you can hear this voice crying out in the wilderness.
Please, please, do not offer them a Blood sacrifice as a way to “save” them or “heal’ them from their trauma based mind control experience. It will only keep them in the dark dungeons of their displaced, fragmented and disassociated minds.
If you read all this thank you. If you do not, that’s fine. I put it out there and that is what matters most. Peace and Blessings, Nana Baakan
According to the Bible God killed more than 2,270,971 people, many of them innocent of any wrongdoing, considerably more than the 10 killings attributed to Satan.*. (God’s tally does not count the large but unspecified numbers such as the Flood and Sodom & Gomorrah, nor Satan’s 10 for which he was given permission by God).God often forbids his followers to show pity or mercy (e.g. Deuteronomy 7:2, Ezekiel 9:5-6). Sometimes, God undertakes the mass killing of children himself (Exodus 12:29). Indeed, children have a particularly hard time of it. Not only are they punished for the crimes of their ancestors, but they are also victims of family cannibalism. To people who fail to meet God’s requirements he promises that, amongst many other tribulations, they will have to eat their own children (Leviticus 26:29 and Deuteronomy 28:53). http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity.com/da0_skygod.htm
NB Commentary: The Internet is a blaze with all manner of memes, information, disinformation, misinformation and out right lies about the phenomenon presently called pizza-gate. Why?
Is it because we have found out that our so-called public officials have indulged in such debauchery and now we are all appalled?
Is it because mainstream media is using the tactic of crying out against “fake news”?
Is it because people just can’t even imagine the abuse of small children to such a large degree?
Is it because it has gone on for so long and people have been killed when they attempt to uncover it or have blatantly discovered it without any contest? (Ted Gunderson and
Centre County Attorney, Ray Gricar, went missing while investigating
the Sandusky child sex abuse ring, for example, along with many others who died mysteriously when investigating this.)
Is it because people who have strong religious leaning can push their agenda and claim that going back to Jesus will save us all from this hideous activity?
Is it because people are appalled that anyone would do what they, in their own hearts have dreamed about, imagined or even attempted to do but pulled back because it was soooo wrong in their estimation? Besides, what if they got found out.
Stay with me here….. I am going to take you on a journey. A journey that goes cross
cultures into the deep recesses of the very spiritual/religious leanings that humans have used to feel sanctified and above reproach.
Now, let’s look at the psyops aspect of it first.
What is a Psysops? It’s commonly known as Psychological Operations. The definition is as follows.
Psyops, or psychological operations, is a term used to describe the techniques of psychological manipulation used in warfare. These operations are used to deceive, confuse, disrupt and demoralize the enemy, with an aim toward weakening enemy resistance or even causing enemy forces to surrender and enemy populations to capitulate.
As the flip-side to the ancient wisdom that knowledge is key to all successful warfare strategies, the art of deliberately sewing deception has been understood and practiced for thousands of years.
But.. Psychological operations can range in scope from those that heal and those that harm. Some may simply be benign. The mind is being manipulated for some reason or other, by another, or maybe even by the individual themselves who may play mind games on him/herself and those around them.
For example, a person may rent a very expensive car, drive it through the neighborhood, show up on their neighbor’s doorstep, show off their car and drive away. In that instance, those who do not know the origin of the car would surmise this person had money. Why, because it would take a heap of money to own such a vehicle. From there they would brag to their friends or shall I say report to their friends that “So and So” has a heap of money. “So and So” drives off having psychically manipulated their perception of reality. He has performed a psyops.. Or con game as it is commonly called when the government is not involved.
So, how often have we, in our individual lives, perpetrated a fraud for the purpose of managing perception of ourselves by others? Women may use make-up, men may build muscle… all in all it’s about creating a perception, a persona, a concept. But is any of it real?
Most times people relate to psyops as something that is done for nefarious reasons, they seldom look in the mirror to ask themselves how many times have they engaged in the same behavior.
Now, let’s look at pedophilia… which mainly eludes to illicit sex with children by adults. Children who in most cases, not all, are remiss and resistant to it. Now, turn around and look at the sexualization of children, particularly in western societies. I do realize that this is not a Western Phenomenon, only.
Far from it, but it is blatantly apparent in the Western World. How often do we as parents, adults, etc, encourage our children to embrace the habits, ways and dress of adults? How many of us expose our children to all manner of behavior through television, movies and print media? Have we ever thought about how this primes them to become “sex slaves” as it were?
Why do we over-sexualize our children? Why do we allow them to view and or engage in sexual promiscuity via the media and in this day and age, YouTube animations that are supposedly designed for children but have so many sexual overtones it’s unbelievable.
I always say, this is an adult world. We birth our children into it and scare them to death the entire time they are here. We don’t protect them, or shield them from that which would harm them most. And in this case, we don’t teach them boundaries and give them consciousness that will help them to determine what is good or safe touch and what is not. We get caught up in the fanfare and notoriety and celebrity madness. We allow them to see half naked women in suggestive poses and we applaud their nakedness. We allow them to listen to music that is sensational and very, very sexual. Therefore we prime them to the point where they know no boundaries or are confused about boundaries between adults and children, thus they are easily manipulated to get into the car or bed of a stranger and/or relative.
We allow them to dance suggestively with each other and with adults. We don’t teach them the appropriate behavior which is really a safe behavior in essence.
Ironically, those folks who want to change this and demand toy manufactures, modeling agencies, media moguls, entertainment, etc., to stop over sexualizing the children would need to go to their respective representatives in the hopes of getting them to enact legislation that would crack down on these exploitive practices. Sadly, too many of them are indulgent and would be too weak to stand against it, may be too afraid to do so, or may simply ignore the outcry do to their own complicity.
Now, to the spiritual/religious/cultural overtones here.
If we go back to the beginning, well, let’s just go to the Bible for starters… Adam
and Eve had two sons, Cain and Abel. According to the story, Cain killed Abel and was exiled. Where did he go and if there was only Adam and Eve, surely he died of loneliness, but I digress.
Let’s go back to Adam and Eve. With their one son at first and then more children coming after, how did they procreate? It would have had to been incestuous quite frankly if we go by the story. If not, then there had to have been more than one Adam and One Eve. If we stick with the Bible story, then we are clearly seeing the population increase through some type of incestuous relationships between parents and siblings because it would have taken many more people to bring the entire human race into existence. Would it not??
And let’s just take a brief look at this terminology. “The Sons of God came unto the daughters of men and there were giants n the land.” Were the sons adults and the daughters children? Were the Sons children and the daughters children and if so, how did they procreate, and create giants no less.
And just a little note about Noah and his family.
Clearly there had to have been incestuous relationships between the family members in order to re-populate the earth after the great flood.
Now, let’s go to Greece… We have many stories of the Greek Gods incestuous relationships. Mothers having children with sons, Fathers having sex with daughters.. Children being sister/brother wives. I won’t detail the instance, you can look that up for yourself. Gods eating their children.
If the Gods did it, then why not humans? Would doing it make you more Godly or closer to God?
It can be dismissed as just myth and lore, but can it really??
It’s a psyops. It shapes perception of reality.
And let’s not talk about Santa Claus and his eminent domain to invade peoples homes all around the world, but I digress again.
Let’s go back to Egypt or Khemet as it has also been referred to. Here we find the same thing happening. Mothers giving birth to children after having intercourse with their son. We have brother and sister husband and wives. We have another culture of incestuous relationships that are documented on the walls of antiquity and glossed over as if it makes no difference at all. It is another Psyops.
Even in African spirituality there are instances where the story goes… Mother mates with her son to bring forth others.
Around the world in small communities where there are no others for miles and miles and miles, there has to be co-mingling among them in order for them to survive. If restrictions were placed upon them that kept them from interbreeding, they would essentially die out, would they not?
Stay with me here.
Now, if co-mingling with relatives is part of human nature, or human society going back centuries, then to scoff at it now is disingenuous or is it not?
Religious and societal sanctions began to emerge over time to relegate the close inter-breeding and marrying between close relatives and even siblings as a sin or deviant, punishable by those in authority. The Catholic Church went so far as to say, you can marry your second cousin but no one closer than that.
Now, let’s look at Pedophilia. It is commonly believed that pedophilia is an act upon a AN UNWILLING child by an adult.
Now, let’s look at the psyops aspect of this. More than likely an adult has lured the child and convinced the child that it is safe, especially if it wants to keep the child participating. Of course there are instances of child abductions and the child is screaming and cryin gand trying to break free. However, I would wager that is not the norm in these so-called pedophile rings. The screaming fear and chaos comes later on after the child has been primed.
When an individual engages in sex, certain energies are released. These energies create a type of nirvana upon climax and Endorphine are released causing a feeling of peace and tranquility. If the individual is under duress, the climax may happen but is short lived and then it becomes a high that is chased after for the duration. Many people become sex addicts do to the pleasure they derive from the sex act and the momentary feeling of nirvana at the point of climax. It gets distorted when a child is involved as the child cannot emit a corresponding energy as an adult would, therefore it’s like only getting an ounce of nirvana when a gallon is required.
So why do they do it? Because it becomes an addiction and like any other addiction they run after it. The child is emitting an energy of fear, trepidation, anxiety, anger, confusion, etc. which can also provide a momentary shot. Therefore they have to have a lot of children to get the full “hit” or so they think. There is no full hit, there is only fragmented beings, being used in a fragmented and distorted way.. Emitting fragmented and distorted energies causing a fragmented and distorted addiction.
In modern society, the sexualization of children offers many options for those who have the inclination toward pedophilia.
1) they can fantasize in private
2) they can get closer to the object of their fantasy by attending child beauty pageants
3) they can become advocates for the safety of children while secretly molesting them
4) it normalizes the sexual admiration of a child thru publicity
5) it fosters credence build on this acceptance and thus it pardons those who actively participate in pedophilic acts
6) it can be used as a tool for blackmail especially for those who are wealthy and/or in high office,
7) it normalizes a rape culture
8) it normalizes child abuse on varying levels.
9)due to the secrecy involved, it allows this behavior to go on unimpeded for decades even centuries when coupled with trauma it release an addictive energetic frequency driving the pedophile to the point of an insane insatiable appetite for the experience.
10)it erodes the fabric of a society rendering it extremely harmful to its members which could lead to total collapse of its viability to sustain its most vulnerable, the children
11)the children who manage to grow up are severely emotionally, mentally, physically and spiritually damaged, may become perpetrators themselves and/or become psychotic
12)this psychosis acts like a virus and spreads to the other members of society creating a poisonous frequency on a psychic level that without the total dismantling of the distortion the society becomes a cesspool of discordant, destructive energies.
What I am saying is this, pedophilia and incest is a part of human history and cultures. Presently it may be demonized in some and herald in others, however, if we go back to the spiritual and fundamental origins of it, we can trace it back thousands upon thousands of years. Children have been used in blood sacrifices, thrown to the volcano, sacrificed to the goods for a harvest and eaten for longevity. If we look deep enough we may find that the rise and fall of so-called great civilizations had and intimate relationship with the rise and fall of these acts against its children.
The question is, Why??
The Occult Cult of Celebrity and the Erosion of the Self.
What is it about human nature that makes humans susceptible to this behavior towards its young? Is it the lore, the myth or the taboo? In some instances these acts made a person closer to the Gods, garnered them favor, staved off famine and earth change catastrophes.
Remember, Abraham who was told by his God to sacrifice his son to prove his faithfulness? That was not unusual for that to happen. Human sacrifice was not rare. They say Yeshuwa was the last “human sacrifice” and yet people eat his body and drink his blood, every Sunday. Think about that.
Where does this come from? Why are humans cannibals? Why do they kill their children? Why do they eat their young thinking it will elongate their own lives? Why do the molest and rape them?
To Me this predilection is the real psyops, the real rabbit hole. Somewhere along the way, humanity has been hardwired to indulge in this type of behavior. Whether out in the open in certain cultures or in secret dark rooms, tunnels and dungeons in others. One of the reasons it won’t stop is because it is in us. It is in all of us.
If we are all God’s creatures, made by God, then why did God create us this way? Even animals protect their young. They do not set up altars to ritualistically kill them. And only when they have matured do they enter into sexual behavior with them. I once had a cat who had several kittens. One of her kittens continued to nurse past the time needed and would get an erection while nursing his mother. Whenever he came near her she would quickly push him away. Of course animals are not always the greatest examples to draw from, but they at least don’t seem to need to appease the Gods by sacrificing their children.
Sacred prostitution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sacred prostitution,temple prostitution,cult prostitution[1], or religious prostitution is a sexual ritual consisting of sexual intercourse or other sexual activity performed in the context of religious worship, perhaps as a form of fertility rite and divine marriage (hieros gamos). Scholars have long considered such practices to be customary in the ancient world.
Some scholars prefer the term sacred sex to sacred prostitution in cases where payment for services was not involved. The Greek term hierodoulos or hierodulehas sometimes been taken to mean sacred holy woman, but it is more likely to refer to a former slave freed from slavery in order to be dedicated to a god.[2] The Hebrew term qedesha is often translated literally as temple holy one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_prostitution
Plato was an early critic of sexual intercourse in pederastic relationships, proposing that men’s love of boys avoid all carnal expression and instead progress from admiration of the lover’s specific virtues to love of virtue itself in abstract form. While copulation with boys was often criticized and seen as shameful and brutish,[48] other aspects of the relationship were considered beneficial, as indicated in proverbs such as A lover is the best friend a boy will ever have. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty
Though pederasty was once accepted in many cultures, some modern observers have retrospectively labeled it abusive. Enid Bloch argues that many Greek boys who were involved in paederastic relationships may have been harmed by the experience, if the relationship included anal sex. Bloch writes that the boy may have been traumatized by knowing that he was violating social customs. According to her, the “most shameful thing that could happen to any Greek male was penetration by another male.” In this respect Bloch is in accord with Greek sexual morality, which also recognized a difference between ethical pederasty which excluded anal sex and “hubristic” pederasty which was believed to debase the boy as well as the man who penetrated him.[89]
Bloch further argues that vases showing “a boy standing perfectly still as a man reaches out for his genitals” indicate the boy may have been “psychologically immobilized, unable to move or run away.”[90] Many other vases show the boy running away.[91]
Every year, the priests of Ishtar would impregnate young virgins on an altarannu dedicated to herself and her husband*. The children were born on Christmas (!!!), and the next year they were sacrificed in the Easter’s Sunday at the sunrise service. The priests would take Ishtar’s eggs and dye them in the blood of the sacrificed children.
*Inanna’s husband was none other that the infamous god Moloch or Melekh, to whom children were – and still are – sacrificed in Satanic rituals. Satanism is the religious worship of the Anunnaki, and the human and animal sacrifices were/are part of the rituals.
“… the oldest, most pristine form of Satanism, the old Sumero-Akkadian-Babylonian mystery religion …Inherent in this culture is the presence and power of demonic spirits, and they became an integral part of my life and even my being. In a culture addicted to power, demonic spirits offered the ultimate power trip. If, in American culture, people are addicted to comfort, status, and prestige, in Satanic culture people are addicted to demonic power.
“Satanism has pervaded western civilization …It has been growing for thousands of years, quietly weaving its way through the very fabric of the culture and the power structures of the nations in the West. It has adherents in all walks of life, in all incomes, and all social strata. It has exerted a profound influence on the intellectual life of the West for the past several hundred years …Satanism has influenced politics, economics, art and music, through the spiritual-psychological process called dissociation, and dissociation is as old as human culture itself.”4 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/matrix/matrix14.htm
There are so many questions and the more you know the more there is to know. But at this point in the journey it can be firmly stated that there is a considerable reptilian connection to ancient and modern control and manipulation of the human race. That is not to say all reptilians in all existence, just some of them. But then we need to ask about the consciousness that incarnates into the reptilian stream because in the end the decisions of action and behavior are taken by consciousness.
John A. Keel points out that historical records say the priests claimed to have the ability to communicate with other-dimensional beings, and that the kings and emperors, including people like Julius Caesar and Napoleon, met with strange beings who materialized and dematerialized. The same goes with today’s leaders who consult their other-dimensional demonic masters. Keel details the literature on secret societies that describes many materializations of fearsome demons, which gave out orders and directed their followers to commit murder or political manipulation. Those who disobeyed would be killed by the entity or fellow members.
“Thus,” he wrote, “the ultraterrestrials are able to guide and control human events through evil men lusting for power.”8
Exactly. Keel goes on:
“…The startling truth, as carefully recorded by the ancient historians, is that ultraterrestrials have always been in direct contact with millions of individuals and that they actually ruled directly over mankind for many years. In recent centuries their influence has become more subtle, but it is always there.”9
Only by understanding the nature of the infinite frequencies or densities of existence can we begin to see the plot. We are being controlled and manipulated on this planet from other dimensions or densities and have been for thousands of years, at least.
The well known writer and researcher on “UFO” topics, Dr Jacques Vallee, asked the right questions when he said:
“Are we dealing…with a parallel universe, where there are human races living, and where we may go at our expense, never to return to the present? Are these races only semi-human, so that in order to maintain contact with us, they need crossbreeding with men and women of our planet?
Is this the origin of the many tales and legends where genetics plays a great role: the symbolism of the Virgin in occultism and religion, the fairy tales involving human midwives and changelings, the sexual overtones of the flying saucer reports, the biblical stories of intermarriage between the Lord’s angels and terrestrial women, whose offspring were giants?
From that mysterious universe, have objects that can materialize and ‘dematerialize’ at will been projected? Are the UFOs ‘windows’ rather than ‘objects’? There is nothing to support these assumptions, and yet, in view of the historical continuity of the phenomenon, alternatives are hard to find, unless we deny the reality of ail the facts, as our peace of mind would indeed prefer.”10 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/matrix/matrix14.htm>
But humans are doing precisely this to each other every day by demanding that everyone conform to the norms to which they blindly conform. This is nothing less than psychological fascism – the thought police with agents in every home, everywhere. Agents so deeply conditioned that most have no idea they are unpaid mind controllers. “I’m just doing what’s right for my children” I hear them say.
No, what you have been programmed to believe is right for them and the belief, also, that only you know best. I remember debating with a former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom at the Oxford Union debating society and he simply could not see a difference between education and indoctrination. It was a wonder to behold.
We see this same theme in our daily experiences of people in uniform and others from the masses who are promoted to power over the masses. It’s summed up by the satirical version of the British Labour Party song, The Red Flag, which goes:
“The working class can kiss my arse, I’ve got the foreman’s job at last.”
I’m a self-declared life long student enrolled in a study of history, civilization, and comparative mythology. One of the most fascinating subjects, almost taboo to discuss, is to look with morbid curiosity on the practice of blood offerings….be it lovely doves or gentle lambs, but especially, humans, and even more so…. innocent human children. We ponder the mystery of a superstitious culture when we view the image of a delicate child mummy sacrificed thousands of years ago in some pre-Colombian ritual. We contemplate what kind of human need there was for this sort of dark practice, and if the seeds of this need lurk in us still today, passed genetically from an ancestor who lived hundreds and thousands of years ago. This ritualistic killing was usually associated with appeasing a god, often to ensure a good harvest. However, no culture is exempt from this practice.
He’s talking about parents sacrificing their children to idol gods—a practice that was quite common in ancient times. Multiple gods got in on the ritual, and if you were really in a desperate situation, you might try offering up your kid to a god who you didn’t normally give that type of offering to. But some gods—such as the Ammonite god named Molek—required child sacrifice on a regular basis, which is why the ancient Jews had set aside a whole ravine near the city of Jerusalem to serve as an ongoing child barbecue. Children were burned alive on super-heated metal idol arms, and you can just imagine how unpleasant the smells and sounds of such a practice would be. It was the infamous Valley of Ben Hinnom which Jesus later used as a metaphor for what Hell would be like: a fire that never dies, weeping and anguish, a foul stench. When Jesus talks about Gehenna in the Gospel books, He’s referring to Ben Hinnom. When Yahweh speaks of Tophet in the Old Testament books, He’s referring to the actual altar in the valley where children were physically killed. Clearly this whole practice was horrific and disturbing on every level. But it was also going on all of the time and right next to the most famous city in Israel. Jerusalem was a major trade center, a very popular worship center, and a key cultural landmark. Yet if you come to Jerusalem, you end up getting a faceful of Tophet, and how are you not disturbed by such a thing? You see, the Jews weren’t trying to hide what they were doing. It’s more like they were intentionally doing it on a grand stage which was strategically located in a place where no one could miss it. Yes, we Christians certainly do want to know that our good Gods are horrified by such a terrible practice, so we feel good when we read about Yahweh exclaiming His horror of this practice not just once, but three times in the book of Jeremiah.
Now wait a second. Here’s Yahweh telling Abraham to barbecue Isaac on some rocks many centuries before the prophet Jeremiah was even born. Suddenly Yahweh’s three claims to have never commanded child sacrifice are sounding disturbingly hypocritical. And then there was that trick He pulled on Jephthah—a guy who vowed to give Yahweh a special sacrifice in return for Yahweh giving Jephthah a miraculous military victory.
Jephthah lived on a farm and had his share of animals. He was used to coming home and having some four-legged thing run to meet him. So when he promised to roast the first creature to greet him when he returned from battle, he figured he was striking up a pretty safe bargain with God. But it turned out that Yahweh didn’t appreciate having His help being treated so cheaply, so after giving Jephthah the victory he wanted, Yahweh made sure that it was Jephthah’s own daughter who outran all of the animals on the day that Jephthah returned from battle. Shocked and horrified by the unexpected turn of events, Jephthah recognized that God was disciplining him for his bad attitude, and he dutifully sacrificed his daughter. So now we have two incidents of Yahweh requiring child sacrifice: one was a direct command, the other was through a manipulation of circumstances. In the case of Abraham, Yahweh called the sacrifice off before it was completed. But in the case of Jephthah, the young woman went down without any Divine intervention. Do these stories bother us? Of course they do. Jephthah’s disturbing account is sandwiched right between the stories of Gideon and Samson—two characters who get frequent mention in Sunday School classes. Yet we consistently skip over Jephthah’s three chapters (Judges 10-12), because it’s just too upsetting to think that Yahweh would ever really want child sacrifice.
Now even if Yahweh didn’t have any history of demanding child sacrifice from His followers, it is beyond ludicrous for a sovereign God to claim that His own creatures can ever do anything which hasn’t occurred to Him. It is our Gods who set the limits on who we humans are and define all of our capacities. We can’t just sit around brainstorming original ideas. Like children who are choosing a cookie from a plate that mom has set out, we can only ever choose among possibilities that our Gods have made available to us. So no, child sacrifice really wasn’t a human original. Not only did Yahweh conceive of the possibility long before we did, but He also designed us with the capacity to find such a loathsome activity appealing under certain circumstances. Whose idea was it to make human beings so utterly selfish that they’d be willing trash their own family members in order to get some god to send rain down on their thirsty crops? Who designed human parents to feel bonded to their own offspring, yet ensured that that bond could also be eroded under certain circumstances? It was our three glorious Creators who designed us to be the selfish, sadistic little creatures that we are, and it was our Creators who taught us everything we know about evil. We humans can do nothing apart from our Gods, and we can’t comprehend anything without Them making our minds work.
In the Old Testament, Yahweh boasts of having absolute control over all things—including life and death. It was through the mouth of Moses that He said:
Not long after, the kids were called out to dance to the hit songs of the season – these songs in my opinion should be rated PG 13. 4-6 year olds trooped to the dance floor, miming the sexually explicit songs and gyrating their bodies in the most sensual manner. They could have given Beyounce a run for her money.
They ran their hands over their bodies, shook their booties hard while their parents cheered them on. The boys had their upper shirts unbuttoned and rapped along perfectly to gangsta raps while doing flawless break dance.
While it might appear that the audience at child pageants is comprised of family and friends of the children who compete, there’s no guarantee that strangers with nefarious intentions haven’t infiltrated the crowd. Whether pedophiles attend the pageants or simply collect the adult-looking photos that many pageant moms love to post online, the mini contestants may easily be exposed to those with a sick interest in them. There’s really no way to tell whether the friendly man taking hours of video footage in the corner is an uncle, grandfather or pedophile.
Instead of thrusting your child forward into the limelight that may cause the destruction of her confidence and send her the message that her only worth lies in how she looks, allow your child to be a child. Surround her with trusted family and friends, encourage her to participate in activities that promote her intellectual and physical abilities and, most of all, keep her away from the sordid world of child pageants.
what’s with parents who watch their little kids dance like prostitutes at parties, in front of everyone and actually cheer them on! The three or four presenters all seemed to agree and one even shared a story of how his 7 year old cousin was dancing at a party and everyone cheered, then the girl suddenly broke into some dip-it-low booty poppin’ moves and her mother immediately sprang up from her seat and dragged her off the dance floor. For me this was an Aha! moment; So I’m not insane then, I’m not the only who thinks that’s just outright wrong.
“Sorcerers chiefly used the blood sacrifice; and while we hold this to be evil, we cannot deny that this method is very efficient. Power flashes forth from newly shed blood, instead of exuding slowly as by our method. The victim’s terror and anguish add keenness, and even quite a small animal can yield enormous power.The great difficulty is in the human mind controlling the power of the lower animal mind. But sorcerers claim they have methods for effecting this and that the difficulty disappears the higher her the animal used, and when the victim is human disappears entirely. (The practice is an abomination but it is so.)
Celebrating our African historical personalities,discoveries, achievements and eras as proud people with rich culture, traditions and enlightenment spanning many years.
NB Commentary:One of the things that I absolutely love about making my videos for YouTube and for my subscribers, is the fact that I learn so much while doing it.
I like to make my videos interactive, so I search the Internet for pictures to go along with what I am trying to convey. In doing so, I come across articles that feature the pictures that I wish to use. Then I end up reading the articles and finding out more and more and more about my subject. A 7-12 minute video may take me hours of reading materials I find on the web. I have always been a researcher, and I have always enjoyed the challenge of integrating my research into a readable and enjoyable theme.
I have posted several links in my blog that you will find a link to in the description below. Be prepared to learn something new or confirm what you already knew.
I also was trained in public speaking so I create a script for my videos so I can express myself as succinctly as possible. Sometimes I get tongue tied, which is just what I do and it shows you all that I am human.
I see making videos as a form of artistry. I feel my creative juices flowing and no sooner I put one up, I get more ideas about my next video. I love the hide and seek that YouTube plays with my videos, because they are monetized and sometimes YouTube feels that after all my hard work and hours of labor, a certain video is not ad friendly. Oh well, I just hope you folks out there don’t mind the ads too much and will come watch some of the other ones as well.
I have set up a Patreon account where you all can support me over there, ad free. I will let you know when I am ready to launch it.
So today, I am watching a video on a YouTube channel called blackmagik363
Video Title “Professor Griff- The Truth about Kanye West ‘Spiritual Attack’, Music Industry Rituals, and Witches”
I really enjoy Brother Rich’s interviewing style. He is well read and informed but still poses the questions in such a way as to want more information and to defer to his guest and gives them ample time to answer. He never interrupts, but is very much an active listener. In this interview with Professor Griff they come upon the question of Bill Clinton being initiated into Voodoo in Haiti. Brother Rich is quite curious as to why the Haitians would initiate a European into their occult magic. I do not think that Professor Griff’s answer was comprehensive enough so I wanted to expound on it in this video.
Being quite aware of the religion and having insight into African Spirituality, I think I can offer a more in depth understanding as to why the Haitians would accommodate Bill Clinton and his wife back in 1975 and since that time. It seems that Mr. Clinton wanted to win the election in his home state of Arkansas. Later, the presidential election, over George Bush, so he asked for help. In return he protected Haiti with the help of Hougan Max Beauvoir.
It is not uncommon for the Priests and Priestess of African Spirituality to be visited by Heads of State from all over the Globe in fact. They may be of all manner of other religious practices but they have heard or already know the power of the “rituals” that can be performed to help them win court cases, elections, positions
of power in government, money, wealth, etc. Some of them come, Bibles and Qur’ans in hand to seek out the help and advice of these Priests. They may do it in secret under the cover of darkness, pay their respects, pay their money, have the rituals done for them and/or do them themselves, or whatever is asked of them. It is not uncommon, not at all. While they may not speak of it publicly or may even denounce it, secretly they are there and they are doing the “work” to get what they want accomplished in their lives professionally, economically, etc.
“In the days leading up to Clinton’s visit, according to sources in Haiti, many occult preparations took place. These were intended not only to grant Clinton the power to overcome the challenges facing his presidency and defeat the Whitewater investigations, but also to give Aristide the power to continue to control Clinton.” http://www.wnd.com/1998/12/3471/
According to the Haiti Observateur, “During a March 31, 1995 visit to Haiti under Aristide’ s restored rule, Clinton took part in a Voodoo initiative ceremony intended to keep him impervious to Republican attacks and to guarantee his re-election.” (FrontPageMag.com, Feb. 20,. 2004). http://canadafreepress.com/2005/cover062805.htm
Clinton joined with Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a defrocked Catholic Priest, to gain more influence in the upcoming election to get Al Gore elected who would continue to favor the Haitian cause. This is where the work became nefarious and Bush ended up throwing up in the lap of the Japanese Prime minister because of the work Aristide did. Al Gore still did not win the election even though he should have, but it just shows that the “work” is not full proof and though it helped to ease the tension and impeachment of Bill Clinton, it did not keep him out of his own lust for young girls and children. But that’s another video.
So to answer the question of why?
Why would the Haitians or any other African Spiritual Practitioners give their rituals, rites and initiations to Europeans? Depending on the integrity of the Practitioners it can simply boil down to politics and economics. I am not too sure if he was actually initiated into the Haitian Priesthood. That initiation is not immediate and takes several years to complete, but I would surmise that he participated in ceremonies and may have gotten some talismans and may even been mounted by spirits. There is a reason why they called him, the “First Black President.” Little did we know he was chumming up with the Haitian Priests and attending Haitian ceremonies, but there was something about him. And it was said he had a certain charm. One that I never understood, but like it was when I didn’t drink the Obama Kool-Aid, I didn’t drink the Clinton Kool-Aid either.
The Clinton foundation ain’t got nothing on the “Pay-to-Play scenario when it comes to unscrupulous African Spirituality Practitioners. If the money is right, the influence right, they will give it to them. They will give you a Chieftaincy, they will give you a stool a crown, a title, what do you want? In return you will build in their country, you will give them money, you will transport them around in fancy cars and jets, you will give them a seat as an Ambassador or in the White House. You will protect their country with your military, you will in essence be accommodating to them, or whatever… It’s a form of spiritual bribery. And remember, the Priest, will never give you any power that will make you independent of him. And that’s another layer of this type of relationship with a Priest who you go to for nefarious reasons. One hand washes the other, but in the African Spirituality rituals of this nature, you don’t see the third hand. Or as some would call it “The Voodoo Double-Cross.”
But what goes around comes around the level of trust is skewed because everybody is using everybody. As the saying goes, there’s no honesty among thieves. So I ain’t surprised that Clinton is a said to be a so-called Voodoo priest down there in Haiti.
Don’t get me wrong, there are very righteous and upstanding African Spirituality Practitioners, but if he was initiated and they did not refuse him, then their ability to “see” him shrouded in all the corruption is very, very suspect. Why would they bring this criminal element into the fold, unless it was going to give them something in return?
Look at Haiti! How did his practice of Voodoo help Haiti? There in lies the answer as to why they would initiate him.
And we won’t go down the scummy road of money laundering, Pedophilia, human trafficking, sex slaves and child abuse. Or even into the very, very nefarious of Voodoo.
Like Professor Griff said and I paraphrase, every thing is energy. It can be used for righteousness or it can be used for nefarious reasons. It can be used to heal or to harm. Energy is neutral, it has no moral construct. It just is.
Just because someone is of African decent and using ancient African Spiritual mysticism does not mean they are not aware of and/or privy to using it for harm.
More Reading
That time Bill and Hillary Clinton went to a voodoo ceremony in Haiti
“For Haitians, Clinton’s ‘liberation’ is more dehumanization.”
There is no Haiti without Bill Clinton. Rarely has the Republic entered the mainstream press since the January 12, 2010 earthquake without mention of the former US President. When it comes to Haiti, Clinton is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent. In the days after the earthquake Clinton saturated the media with Haiti-related appearances on cable newsnetworks, a spread in Esquire Magazine, a speech at the UN, and editorials in prominent newspapers. Clinton is the co-chair of the Interim Commission for the Reconstruction of Haiti. He is the UN Special Envoy for Haiti. And he is the co-director of the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, a foundation involved in number of neoliberal economic initiatives in Haiti. Clinton justifies his involvement by saying he is “responding to the needs of Haitians.” But what needs? Which Haitians? And to what end?
This would be Aristide’s second return from exile. He was ousted by a military coup in 1991 but Bill Clinton, when he was president, returned him to power in 1994 following a US intervention that forced out the military regime.
Aristide fled Haiti again in February 2004, leaving before dawn on a US plane as rebels approached the capital. He accused American diplomats of having kidnapped him, charges that Washington denied.
The Clintons and the Clinton Foundation have a long history in Haiti. During his time as president, Bill Clinton imposed three years of devastating economic sanctions against the country, in an effort to destabilize the military junta. With the failure of this policy, Clinton sent Marines to Haiti to restore Jean-Bertrand Aristide to the presidency. During Aristide’s term, Clinton demanded Haiti’s adherence to brutal IMF austerity policies, while cracking down on Haitian migrants trying to flee the devastated country to the US.
In the immediate aftermath of the 2010 Haitian earthquake, which killed upwards of 300,000 people, Clinton was dispatched as a UN special envoy and co-chairman of the Interim Haiti Recovery Committee to oversee the international aid and investment efforts in the country. Under his watch, there has been a continual looting of the country, with investment designed to exploit the country’s low-paid working class.
NB Commentary: By now it is clear that the so called 1st Amendment is in grave jeopardy. Not like it wasn’t before but it has become blatantly apparent that it is seriously going down hill a thousand miles an hour.
Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have all thrown their hats into the ring of fire. Censorship is ironically being championed by the very Social Media outlets that have made their billions off Social Media.
With the President weighing in on the threat of “Fake News” sites being an affront to Democracy, these wondrous outlets are browning their noses to keep in the good favors of the establishment while corporate media loses its grip on mass consumption. Day by day, little by little, sites are going down, one by one. And we thought the UN take over of the Internet was bad. We never guessed, or did we, that our favorite social media sites would turn us over to the Big Guys and shut us down.
Thinker
As we all know, The New York Times is liberal propane a tool and today’s article calling VC’s article “fake news” is a perfect example of how the perverse elite network of child pedos will present a united front to discredit any effort that blows the whistle and publicizes their debauchary. This is what the owner of Comet Ping Pong meant when he arrogantly stated he wasn’t worried about anything because he has “community support” and is protected from the blowback. They have created this new topic “fake news” and included all real whistle blower efforts under this moniker to fool the masses who are still asleep. But those of us who are Awake know there is nothing fake about the numerous missing children and testimonies and allegations of children who say they have been mercilessly exploited by a network of powerful military, government, celebrity and wealthy elites.
Well folks, it’s happened and we have Podesta to blame! Why did he do that? Couldn’t he have created his own line of innuendos and analogies rather than using the tried and true ones that would lead him and us, straight to a pedophilia connection? Didn’t he realize that we have active imaginations and would basically begin to surmise that along with pedophilia that these folks going to Abramovic’s parties was gonna eat the pizza and the children too. Haven’t we seen enough movies about this debauchery to believe it all to be true? And what about the underground tunnels? Wait, this isn’t Gaza.
That poor ole construction company on the same block as Comet Pizza certainly has not inkling of what could possibly be going on behind closed doors, or inside the holes they are filling in, or opening up, which one is it, since they do both, I would imagine. I saw that in the movies as well.
Can we get Podesta to erase all of his emails? No wait. He did erase some of them. Then how did these get out? The devil is in the details. Podesta, were you being devilish or what?
Now, we, the innocent public and wanna be journalist, have to censor ourselves or be banned forever. We are not faced with having to figure out a way to say it, without saying it. You know, maybe we could come up with our own language. A Pizza with a line threw it.
Or maybe the word PEDO spelled backwards, with a line through it.
Let’s use adult bodies with children clothes on it and put a line through that. Ha, that might be too risqué as we know that sometimes mean pedophilia as well.
Well, I guess we will just have to find alternatives to the alternatives and investigate and share our findings on other outlets. And I guess Google, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube haven’t gotten the memo. Just like we found their social networks we can find others.
BTW, they actually banned Reddit and Twitter posters and their posts!!! Imagine that!! There are some folks in some really influential places who can pull some strings and get the job done. Too bad they didn’t do that to the advantage of the people. Too bad it was done to cover their own dirty tricks and not to expose the real culprits, who are not the ones reporting it, but the ones hiding it.
Too bad the sake, life and mental health of thousands of children is not as important as their image, sales and profits. It’s simply too bad and very, very sad.
Below, I have listed several sites that have not been censored.. So far anyways.
I’ve created this blog to share the information 4chan has collectively gathered and researched about a suspected pedophilia and human trafficking ring that we seem to have uncovered existing within our DC politicians and the elite class.
It all started with one incredibly suspicious email that had skeptics suggesting they weren’t actually talking about pizza, but rather in code. Here it is;
The U.S. Military Flag Officers also have total proof that junior George W. Bush’s war in Iraq was based on lies, was illegal and UN-Constitutional, and that the 9/11 BLACK OP attack on the American People was an inside job and an extension of the year 2000 electoral coup d’état, which allowed George W. Bush to illegally take power in the United States, then with the events of 9/11 declare “Martial Law” on American soil using the UN-Constitutional Patriot Act similar to Adolf Hitler’s Nazi German 1933 “Enabling Act”.
James Alefantis is the owner of pizza joint Comet Ping Pong, he is the romantic partner of former CTR director David Brock. Here is a link confirming this and showing them caught up with another individual in some kind of blackmail love triangle:
BREAKING: From the anon who brought you the Laura Silsby connection: I have uncovered a pedophile with links to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, David Brock, George Soros, Marina Abramovic and the Podestas
Editor’s NoteThe following articles are provided for those who are new to PIZZAGATE. Each one offers a different angle on this rapidly unfolding “Greatest Scandal of the Third Millennium”.
NB Commentary: This guy! We are being hoodwinked again with this proposition that we need “Big Brother” to censor “Fake News”!No, we don’t need discernment.We don’t need our own ability to sort through and sift through the BS.No we are not mature enough or able to critically think for ourselves.We need to have it done for us.So, under the guise of protecting Democracy, whose greatest tenet is freedom of speech, let’s start sorting through the “Fake News”, shut them down, censor them on social media and decide for the ignorant masses what they need to or don’t need to know, read or discern.Facebook, you fail at doing this for the masses.Twitter, you are so awful we need to tell you what to keep out of your feeds.Oh, we won’t look at the color revolutions that took place because of social media. In fact, when they happened we were cheering and jumping up and down about how wonderful it was that we were able to use social media to get the word out in a moments notice. People on the streets in mass, like never before.And when we were able to get the word out on social media about the never ending threats posed by ISIS and their (fake) beheadings, we were very confident that the viewing public would be certain that what they were seeing was true. Without a doubt.
Let’s go all the way back to the Bin Laden videos while we are at it. Or how about 9/11 CGI. That news was so real we were able to go to war on it and kill millions of people.I am not talking about the “news” that accused Assad of gassing his own people and the picture of the dead bodies that turned out to be “fake” news. No, it doesn’t apply when the government is behind the propaganda. It is just when the alt-right and alt-left do not parrot the party line, that’s when we need to determine which one of those characters are faking it till they make it.Hillary started this ball rolling when she spoke out against Info-Wars and Brietbart.The major networks did their stories so well that when the Donald won, they were shocked!!! So who faked those polls? Certainly not alternative media. In fact it was there that folks could get the real news.
These people are always coming up with some way to counter a movement when it is not in their favor, but will surely feel really happy about a movement that is in their favor.
The majority of folks, especially here in America, barely read any other news except what comes from mainstream. They believe the lies the MSM tells them that is blasted at them thru their televisions. If you mention to them something that was not on Television, a counter perspective or simply a different one, they look at you like you have 2 heads, they dismiss you as a kook or a conspiracy theorist.
So this is an attack on Democracy! This is censorship! This is a big fat lie, to say freedom of speech needs to be monitored and by whom may I ask. Will the government get a think tank together to determine who’s fake and who’s not? According to what criteria?? The more things change, the more they stay the same.
What’s going on? Both Internet companies claim they’re changing their advertising policy to counter misinformation, indicating they’ll monitor content to assure it. Is censorship intended instead? Will reliable information sources challenging the official narrative be targeted? Will other similar online companies operate the same way?
Is net neutrality threatened? Is online freedom and openness at risk – content available without restrictions, limitations, or discrimination, a level playing field for everyone, the essence of democratic free expression?
A pre-election article discussed covert Google support for Hillary – its searches rigged for her, a way to sway undecided voters to choose her over Trump, while suppressing negative search terms about her.
Media scoundrels, Google, Facebook, and similar online operations and powerful tools for what power brokers want disseminated, restricting or blocking content they want suppressed.
Speech, press and academic freedoms are vital elements of free societies. Without them all other rights are endangered.
We the poor sheeple, who read newspapers, watch television and get our news from social media, may be in peril when it comes to being able to determine what is really going on in our world. I guess they see how easily we can be lead astray, in fact, haven’t they done it more times than we can count.
The history of this country is over populated with propaganda to support an agenda. Let’s just start with the profusion of false flags for starters. However, what they did not expect was that outlets like Facebook and Twitter, which they thought they could manage by infiltrating them with CIA agents, has gotten off the ground running faster than the speed of light, and too fast for them to keep up with, so now we need to crack down on them more and more, because Democracy is now in peril, as if this was ever a Democracy anyway.
How many times have folks been censored or demonized because they offered an alternative perspective to what the MSM has given us? How often has policies, laws and codes been instituted based on what was given to us in the MSM? How many times did they “Wag the Dog” to make a point and affect public sentiment? Not the so called “fake news” outlets but the so called “Real News”, the mainstream Media.
Now, social media, has become a runaway locomotive and it is not doing what they initially thought it would do. It is allowing folks to fact check, to research, to look deeper into the narrative that is being given by the MSM and now it’s a threat.
Ironically, these outlets have been censoring content since before he felt threatened by it. They have also been moving content around so that it could be viewed under circumstances that would get the most traction. People have resorted to the Blogosphere in order to get the news out due to the already entrench censorship.
So what are we looking at here?
YouTube, creating a rewards program to encourage folks to become “flaggers” of content.
Facebook dropping folks into the Facebook jail and giving police access to the ability to shut down your live stream.
And Twitter, stopping content from being in their streams.
Is he just parroting what is already taking place. Or does his words sanction it?
Forget the BS around Democracy or fake news threatening. Has fake news become the new ISIS?
I really hadn’t intended on ranting on this one, but hypocrisy really gets me hyped!!
“In an age where there’s so much active misinformation ― and it’s packaged very well, and it looks the same when you see it on a Facebook page or you turn on your television ― where some overzealousness on the part of, you know, a U.S. official is equated with constant and severe repression elsewhere, if everything seems to be the same, and no distinctions are made, then we won’t know what to protect,” Obama said.
“We won’t know what to fight for, and we can lose so much of what we’ve gained in terms of the kind of democratic freedoms and market-based economies and prosperity that we’ve come to take for granted,” he added.
Marina Fang Associate Politics Editor, The Huffington Post
In a joint press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Obama warned that the ease with which people can promulgate fraudulent news stories threatens basic democratic principles.
“In an age where there’s so much active misinformation ― and it’s packaged very well, and it looks the same when you see it on a Facebook page or you turn on your television ― where some overzealousness on the part of, you know, a U.S. official is equated with constant and severe repression elsewhere, if everything seems to be the same, and no distinctions are made, then we won’t know what to protect,” Obama said.
“We won’t know what to fight for, and we can lose so much of what we’ve gained in terms of the kind of democratic freedoms and market-based economies and prosperity that we’ve come to take for granted,” he added.
Facebook in particular has come under fire for not distinguishing between credible and false news sources, helping to fuel misinformation on political issues and candidates. The site’s algorithm doesn’t filter out articles from websites presenting slanted or blatantly false coverage ― instead, when users post those links, they look as if they were from reliable news outlets. The company announced on Monday that it would take steps to address the problem.
If we can’t discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda, then we have problems.President Barack Obama
In a veiled criticism of President-elect Donald Trump, Obama spoke more broadly on the state of democracies around the world, cautioning both Americans and Europeans to “not take for granted our systems of government and our way of life,” advising that “democracy is hard work.”
He also urged a greater emphasis on facts and reason.
“If we are not serious about facts and what’s true and what’s not, and particularly in an age of social media, where so many people are getting their information in sound bites and snippets off their phones, if we can’t discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda, then we have problems,” Obama said.
“If people, whether they are conservative or liberal, left or right, are unwilling to compromise and engage in the democratic process and are taking absolutist views and demonizing opponents, then democracy will break down,” he added. “And so I think my most important advice is to understand, what are the foundations of a healthy democracy and how we have to engage in citizenship continuously, not just when something upsets us, not just when there’s an election or when an issue pops up for a few weeks. It’s hard work.”
TRUMP GETS HIS WALL………. OBAMA GETS HIS POLICE STATE!!!
NB Commentary: This is so fucked! And Obama thought he was hated????
Trump gets his wall: Huge barricade and no-fly zone is put in place around Manhattan’s Trump Tower amid protests at The Donald’s shock election victory
The no-fly zone will be in play until Trump’s inauguration in January
The Secret Service will vet those working and living in Trump Towers
Police officers have helped to install concrete barriers around the Tower
The lavish building is Trump‘s main residence and business headquarters
Security measures come amidst calls for Trump’s assassination on Twitter
PUBLISHED: 06:54 EST, 10 November 2016 | UPDATED: 17:49 EST, 10 November 2016
Donald Trump’s transition from a flashy businessman and reality TV star to the President of the United States is keeping the security services busy.
A no-fly zone was imposed over his home and workplace, Trump Tower, on Fifth Avenue in New York on November 9.
The Federal Aviation Administration edict bans any aircraft in a two mile radius within 3,000ft of the 58-story building, which was the setting of the NBC television show The Apprentice and is not only Trump’s main residence but is also a tourist hotspot.
he flight ban will re-route many helicopter tours of the city, limit the work of media helicopters as well as re-routing commercial aircraft. Drones are also banned
Military, police emergency and secret service flights are exempt from the ban.
Mashable reports that the change could cause flight delays out of LaGuardia Airport.
Flights are also limited over Vice President Mike Pence’s Indianapolis home.
The no-fly zone will be in play until Trump’s inauguration on Friday 20 January, 2017, when he will move into the White House.
Meanwhile, on the ground, police officers have helped to install concrete barriers around the Tower.
A row of sanitation trucks filled with sand have been acting as barricades along Fifth Avenue between 56th and 57th streets since Monday in order to protect the tower against car bombs.
A no-fly zone has been imposed around Trump Tower, on Fifth Avenue, New York Sources said one lane of traffic that passes the Tower is expected to remain closed to prevent car bomb attacks.An NYPD checkpoint is also in operation outside the building while 56th street between Fifth and Madison is closed to traffic. On Thursday, heavily-armed officers could be seen around the president-elect’s home while Trump himself visited the White House.Trump and Melania, departed from LaGuardia airport in New York at 9.36am on his personal aircraft and arrived at Ronald Reagan National Airport just after 10.30am. Following the meeting, Obama said that he had an ‘excellent conversation’ with Trump. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, owner of the New York Observer and a senior adviser to the president-elect’s campaign, was also in tow.People who work and live inside Trump Tower will also now be vetted by the Secret Service, the New York Daily News reports.And elevator routes will also be altered to stop people accessing Trump’s personal floors. ‘Obviously, Trump Tower is not like a house in the suburbs or the country. It’s a tourist location, with businesses and apartments inside, people coming in and out at all hours,’ a source told the New York Daily News.The glass building is one of New York’s most visited attractions since its completion in 1983. If Hillary Clinton had won the election, these additional security measures would not have been needed as her Chappaqua home is already deemed safe from when it acted as a presidential home for husband Bill.Trump first received a Secret Service detail after requesting one in November 2015.Clinton already had protection because of her status as a former first lady. When Trump and his family move into The White House in January, 10-year-old Barron Trump will be the youngest presidential son to reside in the executive mansion since John F. Kennedy, Jr.The White House has been home to only presidential daughters since JFK, Jr., whose father was assassinated just before his 3rd birthday in 1963.Kennedy’s son broke a long drought of boys living in The White House. He was the first since Quentin and Archie Roosevelt lived there beginning in 1901.Outside Trump Tower on Thursday, protesters gathered with signs reading ‘Dump Trump’.At least 30 people were arrested when cops cracked down on twin demonstrations in Columbus Circle and at Trump Tower.As many as 7,500 protesters were believed to have been split between the two locations, chanting ‘Black Lives Matter’ and ‘Donald Trump, go away, racist, sexist, anti-gay.’Cher and Madonna were among the NYC protesters, with Cher telling one supporter they needed to ‘fight.’It wasn’t just New York that saw violence break out overnight. Tens of thousands of people across the country marched against the President-elect before angry mobs attacked police, started fires and shut down highways.The streets of downtown Oakland in California were choked with smoke Thursday as police launched tear gas and protesters lit fires, in what became by some distance the most violent of the many protests. More than 6,000 protesters were seen on the streets of Oakland with an initially peaceful march down a cop-lined street turning nasty after some protesters threw bottles at officers and torched a police car. An office block was also attacked, daubed with ‘f*** Trump’ and ‘kill Trump’ graffiti and then set alight.And thousands more filled streets in Los Angeles before taking over the 110 Freeway while other protesters gathered outside City Hall, lighting fires and waving Trump heads on sticks. There were 14 arrests. Trump’s poll-defying win has sparked a wave of similar rallies in Chicago, Illinois; Portland, Oregon; and San Francisco, California, among many others.Outside the White House, a candlelit vigil was being held in protest against Mr Trump’s inflammatory and divisive brand of politics. But even peaceful protests in that city went awry, with at least one protester being bundled into the back of a van by the Secret Service. In another step towards Trump taking office, his transition team has launched a new website and Twitter account for him.Visitors to greatagain.gov can find information on Trump’s polices as well as biographical information about the Republican. The website also includes a notice that it’s looking to fill 4,000 slots for presidential appointees, but doesn’t have instructions on how to apply for positions.The transition team’s Twitter account, @transition2017, posted its first tweet Wednesday night. It reads: ‘Working together, we will begin the urgent task of rebuilding our nation and renewing the American dream.’ New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is leading Trump’s transition team.
decacsinc 
Recent Comments